Loss of GMO cotton makes Burkina Faso farmers poorer

Sam Reynolds Canyon Gap Superman

I have enough trouble remembering names so what chance with pronouns

When people demand you respect their chosen pronoun, they seem at least to forget how difficult it is to even remember surnames.

Speaking from experience, I had enough trouble remembering names when I was young. This became crystal clear after sharing a coffee with a friend at graduate school, we encountered someone outside the coffee shop and I plain forgot his name. We shared the same first name.

When I was at graduate school in Japan, there are over 20 nationalities among the student body. At the suggestions of the professors, we just focused on learning each other’s nickname.

Do not go on about how we should try and learn to pronounce each other’s name. Japanese, despite learning English at high school, often pronounce my name Jimu Rosu. That became important when a guy called Ross was paid my salary at University I was working on the side. Rose and Ross are written the same way in katakana.

People who are good at languages are more arrogant than those who are good at maths. They think something wrong with you because they by accident of birth have a natural gift for languages. Members of many language groups cannot hear certain sounds because they are simply filtered out in the way the brain processes sounds.

That is before we get to face blindness with some people simply cannot see people’s faces in the way other people process the information of the whole face. They see the nose and the mouth but not the whole picture.

Going back to graduate school in Japan, Korean friends were quite insistent of being called by their family name. As the majority of their country is called Kim, Lee or Park, I really do not know how they keep track of each other. How do you work out if you have a friend in common, much less who to vote for?

Then we come to the many friends who had no family name. What more, some came from countries where you could change your name at will such as Burma.

With Japanese, it was important to remember to add san after speaking to them because otherwise they would not realise you were speaking to them. Many of their names have other meanings unless the honorific is added at the end. Japanese developed family names in the 19th century. Many are related to place or occupation as are many old English names.

If you want someone to remember your name, or other details about you, most people use a bit of charm to win cooperation. Going back to forgetting my friend’s name despite him having the same first name as me, the cause was the stress of having to remember it. People do not remember names well when under stress.

The mechanisms for winning cooperation and friends are well known. Badgering people is not one of them . Why people choose to badger people rather than use charm and patience is not a mystery.

Early Unions were rather practical

My favorite Stones song

Shocking! The SEC rules that activist shareholders can’t force oil companies to stop being oil companies!

Watts Up With That?

Guest hyperbole by David Middleton

Since, someone will very likely comment that the article doesn’t say that activist shareholders were trying to force oil companies to stop being oil companies, I will answer preemptively:

  1. You don’t know what an oil company is or does.
  2. The thread title was intentionally hyperbolical.

One of the two answers above may be hyperbolical.

However, my thread title is not nearly as misleading as the title of this Axios article:

Amy Harder Apr 2

Investors stunned over oil producer’s climate-change exemption

A new twist is unfolding in the fight between activist investors and the oil industry: an unprecedented move by federal regulators allowing a major producer to preemptively kill a shareholder resolution on climate change without a vote.

Why it matters: The Securities and Exchange Commission’s support of oil producer EOG Resources is emerging as a flashpoint in what has become America’s central battleground over climate…

View original post 608 more words

In California Everything Causes Cancer, So Labels Say

Science Matters

Best attempt at a scary cup of coffee.

An update on left coasters freaking out about cancerous items is provided by Sara Chodosh in Popular Science California needs to stop saying everything causes cancer

Unsurprisingly, it is the nanny state doing the fear mongering. Excerpts below with my bolds.

You may have heard that coffee gives you cancer. Or that everything gives you cancer—if you live in California.

The reason: Proposition 65. It’s a California state law that requires businesses with 10 or more employees to provide reasonable warning about the use of any chemicals the state has decided could cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. One of these chemicals is acrylamide, which a rodent study pinned as a possible carcinogen. It’s found in almost everything that’s cooked at a high temperature. And because a particularly litigious law firm recently sued the state for not properly warning…

View original post 985 more words

Climate Change in the Courts

Big Picture News, Informed Analysis

SPOTLIGHT: Environmentalists have long used the courts to achieve their goals – rather than doing the hard work of persuading the rest of us to share their latest concern.

BIG PICTURE: Australian journalist Tony Thomas has written an informative and entertaining account of a lawsuit currently underway in California. Titled Warmism Gets a Courtroom Thrashing, it’s a great 10-minute read.

The cities of San Francisco and Oakland are suing oil companies for alleged climate damages. Anyone who has ever driven an automobile, used natural gas to heat their home in the dead of winter, or boarded an airplane knows that fossil fuels are essential. Without them, life as we know it would screech to a halt.

Nevertheless, companies that do the difficult and dangerous work of making fossil fuels available to the rest of us are being dragged into court. In this instance, they’re being accused of “unlawful public…

View original post 389 more words

The Declaration of Breda.

European Royal History

On this date in History: April 4, 1660. Charles II, King of England, Scotland and Ireland issues The Declaration of Breda.


The Declaration of Breda (dated April 4, 1660) was a proclamation by Charles II of England, Scotland and Ireland in which he promised a general pardon for crimes committed during the English Civil War and the Interregnum for all those who recognised Charles as the lawful king; the retention by the current owners of property purchased during the same period; religious toleration; and the payment of pay arrears to members of the army, and that the army would be recommissioned into service under the crown. The first three pledges were all subject to amendment by acts of parliament.

The declaration was named after the city of Breda in the Netherlands. It was actually written in the Spanish Netherlands, where Charles had been residing since March 1656; however, at the…

View original post 673 more words

#OTD Greatest Speech Ever – RFK Announcing The Death Of Martin Luther King

Previous Older Entries


Res ipsa loquitur - The thing itself speaks

(macro)Economics live from London

Franck Portier's professional page

Catallaxy Files

Australia's leading libertarian and centre-right blog

Climate Audit

by Steve McIntyre

The Secret Barrister

Independent Blogger of the Year, The Comment Awards 2016 & 2017

Notes On Liberty

Spontaneous thoughts on a humble creed


A New Zealand lawyer, ex-MP, farmer and enthusiast for life opines on law, politics and the universe

Books & Boots

reflections on books and art

Legal History Miscellany

Posts on the History of Law, Crime, and Justice

The Dangerous Economist

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

Sex, Drugs and Economics

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

The Long Run

the EHS blog

The Undercover Historian

Beatrice Cherrier's blog

Vincent Geloso

Economics, History, Lots of Data and French Stuff


Tracking Anthropogenic Climate Alarmism

Science Matters

Reading between the lines, and underneath the hype.

Point of Order

Politics and the economy


Libertarian environmentalism

Doc's Books

A window into Doc Freiberger's library

Newmark's Door

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

Media Myth Alert

Calling out media myths

Uneasy Money

Commentary on monetary policy in the spirit of R. G. Hawtrey

European Royal History

Exploring the History of European Royalty

Tallbloke's Talkshop

Cutting edge science you can dice with


Small Steps Toward A Much Better World


The blog for those who LOVE Lieutenant Columbo...

The Risk-Monger

Let's examine hard decisions!


“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert”. - J Robert Oppenheimer.


The truth about the great wind power fraud

Trust, yet verify

Searching for the missing pieces of climate change communication

Roger Pielke Jr.

professor, author, speaker


Promoting fair and accurate coverage of Israel

Economics in the Rear-View Mirror

Archival Artifacts from the History of Economics


Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

Velvet Glove, Iron Fist

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

Lindsay Mitchell

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law


Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

croaking cassandra

Economics, public policy, monetary policy, financial regulation, with a New Zealand perspective

%d bloggers like this: