A new paper critiquing net-zero targets

croaking cassandra

I wrote a post a few weeks ago responding, in part, to absurd claims made in a TV interview by the Green Party co-leader and Minister for (against) Climate Change, James Shaw about the economic impact of pursuing the net-zero emissions target he and the Labour Party are championing.

He says investing in meeting our climate change goals will be a massive economic boost, rather than a burden.

“What we’re talking about here is a more productive economy, with higher-tech, higher-valued, higher-paid jobs. It’s clearly a cleaner economy where you’ve got lower health care costs, people living in warmer homes, congestion-free streets in Auckland.

“It’s an upgrade to our economy. It’s an investment, you’ve got to put something in, in order to generate that return. If we don’t, the clean-up costs from the impacts of climate change will well exceed the costs of the investment we’ve got to make to…

View original post 1,481 more words


Zombie economics is back on seller concentration and market power @Noahopinion

From https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WD(2018)69/en/pdf

Discussing scientific research can be a discriminatory act

Nations with greater gender equality have a lower percentage of female STEM graduates