I’ve opined that statist policies harm young people.
I also shared this video explaining why big government is bad for millennials and the Gen-Z crowd.
This should be a slam-dunk issue. After all, don’t they know how the communist world collapsed?
Or, to make it personal, don’t they have any inkling of the fact that they are going to get screwed by entitlement programs?
And what about the fact that they lose out because of Obamacare?
Sadly, it appears many of them haven’t learned the right lesson.
I’ve wondered, only half-jokingly, whether they’re too clueless to vote.
David Grasso opines on this topic for the New York Post.
It’s important to look at the typical millennial trajectory, and why unprecedented government intervention…
View original post 454 more words
When I wrote the Poison of Precaution earlier this year, one piece was missing from that puzzle. What was the logic behind the acceptance that being right didn’t matter? And why do some scientists, who know better about what is not right, then tolerate this scientific illogic? I had to put precaution into a belief system.
What would happen if we compared the precautionary principle from today’s environmentalist religion to Pascal’s Wager on the existence of God from pre-Enlightenment Christian religion? Both do not follow an evidence-based approach and build their logic on the conclusion that, in the face of uncertainty, being factually correct is not as important as the potential consequences from the risk of being wrong. Just as Pascal’s argument is neither genuine nor convincing, the precautionary logic does not reinforce the eco-theology and is merely a manipulative tool to emotionally manage away uncertainty.
When your belief system…
View original post 1,634 more words
In 1961 the controversial British historian, A.J.P. Taylor published THE ORIGINS OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR arguing that the war was caused by the appeasement policies pursued by England and France toward Nazi Germany. He further purported that Adolf Hitler was more of a traditional European statesman who easily could have been stopped in March 1936 at the Rhineland bridges had England and France had the will to do so. This book created a firestorm in academic circles and over the years numerous historians have challenged Taylor’s conclusions. Among the first was J.W. Wheeler-Bennett’s MUNICH: PROLOGUE TO TRAGEDY followed later by Telford Taylor’s MUNICH: THE PRICE OF PEACE, Lynne Olson’s TROUBLESOME YOUNG MEN: THE REBELS WHO HELPED SAVE ENGLAND, David Faber’s MUNICH THE 1938 APPEASEMENT CRISIS, and last year a fictional account was written by Robert Harris. These books among many…
View original post 1,342 more words