A very nice roundup. Studies of the reasons why people disagree with the science on global warming is often motivated reasoning.
They disagree with the proposed regulatory solutions, their costs relative to their benefits. As is common in political discussions across the political spectrum, you concede nothing and attack everything the other side says, including their science.
by Judith Curry
Liberals and environmentalists would do well to take on board the categorical imperative of climate policy from a conservative point of view, namely, that whatever policies are developed, they must be compatible with individual liberty and democratic institutions, and cannot rely on coercive or unaccountable bureaucratic administration. – Steven Hayward
View original post 2,661 more words
Utopia, you are standing in it! 
Recent Comments