
https://www.facebook.com/groups/marketurbanismreport/permalink/1997265447100571/?sfnsn=mo&ref=share
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
14 Aug 2021 Leave a comment
in economics of regulation, law and economics, politics - Australia, politics - New Zealand, politics - USA, property rights, Public Choice, public economics, regulation, rentseeking, urban economics Tags: housing affordability, land supply, zoning
14 Apr 2014 Leave a comment
in Austrian economics, industrial organisation, regulation
03 Apr 2014 Leave a comment
in global financial crisis (GFC), great depression, regulation
29 Mar 2014 Leave a comment
in global financial crisis (GFC), great recession, labour economics, regulation
15 Mar 2014 Leave a comment
in liberalism, politics - Australia, politics - USA, Public Choice, regulation Tags: AIDS, AZT, Dallas Buyers Club, David Friedman, drug lags, FDA, Matthew McConaughy, Sam Peltzman
Deciding if a new drug is safe is a serious issue. Separate to this is whether the drug is better than existing drugs.
In 1962, an amended law gave the FDA authority to judge if a new drug produced the results for which it had been developed. Formerly, the FDA monitored only drug safety. It previously had only sixty days to decide this. Drug trials can now take up to 10 years.
Who cares if a safe drug works or not? If a new drug does not work or is no better than the existing drugs on the market, the investors in the development of the new drug bear the (unrecoverable) development costs. Capitalism is a profit AND loss system. Losses are a signal that you should try something else.
Sam Peltzman showed in a famous paper in 1973 that these 1962 amendments reduced the introduction of effective new drugs in the USA from an average of forty-three annually in the decade before the 1962 amendments to sixteen annually in the ten years afterwards. No increase in drug safety was identified.
Drugs became available years after they were on the market outside the USA. To quote David Friedman:
“In 1981… the FDA published a press release confessing to mass murder. That was not, of course, the way in which the release was worded; it was simply an announcement that the FDA had approved the use of timolol, a ß-blocker, to prevent recurrences of heart attacks.
At the time timolol was approved, ß-blockers had been widely used outside the U.S. for over ten years.
It was estimated that the use of timolol would save from seven thousand to ten thousand lives a year in the U.S. So the FDA, by forbidding the use of ß-blockers before 1981, was responsible for something close to a hundred thousand unnecessary deaths.”
AZT double-blind trials collapsed in the mid-1980s in the USA because participants sold the drug in the black market.
If memory serves right, Australian drug regulators planned to duplicate these double-blind trials in Australia before approving the drug. Last time I checked, the physiology of Australians was the same as any other human being. What did they plan to find that justified the delay in approving AZT?
The duplicate double-blind AZT trials in Australia were abandoned not because they were mad and evil, but because again the participants sold the drug in the black market. That was to be expected too so the duplicate double-blind AZT trials in Australia in the 1980s were a double evil.
Economics, and such stuff as dreams are made on
"The British constitution has always been puzzling, and always will be." --Queen Elizabeth II
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
by Steve McIntyre
(Formerly Hatful of History)
Reading between the lines, and underneath the hype.
Commentary on monetary policy in the spirit of R. G. Hawtrey
Markets Matter, Money Matters...
Scholarly commentary on law, economics, and more
Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more
Commentary on Australian and world events from a socialist and democratic viewpoint
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
For Walkability and Good Transit, and Against Boondoggles and Pollution
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
Commentary on development, globalization, and trade by Jonathan Dingel.
Roger Moore's film criticism, against the grain since 1984.
History and Hardware of Warfare
Franck Portier's professional page
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
WORLD WAR II, EIGHTIES, MUSIC, HISTORY, HOLOCAUST
News, reviews and talk all about the Tudors
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
Reading The Classics
Examining Gender Identity ideology and its impact on Women's Sex based rights and Gay Rights. Exploring how this has taken such firm root in Western societies (Cognitive & Regulatory Capture).
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
Res ipsa loquitur - The thing itself speaks
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
Thoughts on public policy and the media
Researching the House of Commons, 1832-1868
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
Blogging on parliament, politics and people, from the History of Parliament
reflections on books and art
Posts on the History of Law, Crime, and Justice
Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law
Recent Comments