Brilliant newspaper archival work for those of that deny the 1970s global cooling scare. I remember writing high school essays on the topic.
Naomi Oreskes of Harvard believes that there is a giant big tobacco/big oil conspiracy of paid skeptics trying to destroy the planet. She has a loyal following in the academic community and the press, who are somehow too lame to actually contact skeptics like myself and find out that she is a wildly paranoid loon.
Other conspiracy nutcases include people who believe the moon landing was faked, based on evidence like this.
They argue that the shadows must have been from a local light source, because the guy closer to the light has a longer shadow. These geniuses are too stupid to understand that a local light source would have the exact opposite effect – the further person would have the longer shadow.
The astronaut on the right in the NASA photograph has a longer shadow because he is standing near the top of the hill, and the one on the left is…
View original post 967 more words
Utopia, you are standing in it! 
Recent Comments