What’s the best way to understand the burden of government regulation and red tape?
Is it better to focus on the overall burden by sharing 
data about aggregate cost, job losses, time wasted, and foregone growth?
Or is it better to look at specific examples of regulatory foolishness, such as silly rules that force consumers to use crummy dishwashers, inferior light bulbs, substandard toilets, and inadequate washing machines?
If the latter approach is best, we have a great (in a bad sense) new example.
Nicole Carroll of CrossFit has a column in the Washington Post that dissects a disturbing new regulatory scheme from the busy-body local government.
D.C….government is developing misguided regulations that would add burdensome red tape to the most innovative fitness programs. Specifically, the D.C. Council has enacted a law — the first in the nation…
View original post 559 more words
Utopia, you are standing in it! 
Recent Comments