Coming just days after they posted approvingly about something they admit is ‘a long winded story’ about a paper written by the Konsensus hit team that happened to be rejected by five journals before finally being accepted, Real Climate (should it be Real Klimate or Real Slimeate?) goes after Bjorn Lomborg. Again.
I don’t know if it’s embarrassment over their hit job paper or if it’s just something they’ve contracted to do, but they have gone after Lomborg before. See here and here for just two examples.
Lomborg, the Skeptical Environmentalist, is sure to attract ire from Konsensus Kooks such as Dana Nuccitelli and John Cook. But Stefan Rahmstorff? I sort of thought he was a serious scientist.
Rahmstorff goes after Lomborg because he has only published 20 papers (seriously–I guess there’s a metric out there for enemies). Considering that Lomborg doesn’t even call himself a climate scientist (he’s…
View original post 619 more words
Utopia, you are standing in it! 
Sep 02, 2015 @ 18:31:33
hmm nothing about the criticism only you are not allowed to criticise him.
this doesn’t really show you in a great light Jim.
LikeLike
Sep 02, 2015 @ 18:41:36
So neither side goes over the top?
LikeLike
Sep 03, 2015 @ 09:59:59
Most certainly the real climate article did not but merely reading the article you linked wouldn’t tell you any criticism they made. All were valid,
When I criticise a article someone has written I show why they are wrong. Merely bleating about the criticism usually means the criticism is correct.
LikeLike