Ross McKitrick writes at National Post ‘Believing the science’ on climate change doesn’t mean any policy goes. Excerpts in italics with my bolds
Mainstream science and economics do not support much of the current climate policy agenda and certainly not the radical extremes demanded by activist groups
There’s an assumption out there that if you “accept” the science of climate change, you are obliged to support drastic measures to cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This is not true. The one does not follow from the other. Mainstream science and economics do not support much of the current climate policy agenda and certainly not the radical extremes demanded by activist groups.
/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/4192727/climate-change-uncertainty-loop.0.jpg)
Elements of Integrated Assessment Models, or IAMs.
In a recent peer-reviewed paper, my co-authors and I proved this using one of the economic models governments and academics around the world rely on. Policy-makers compute the social costs of GHG emissions…
View original post 752 more words
Utopia, you are standing in it! 
Recent Comments