The Truth About Climate Change
03 Oct 2018 Leave a comment
in environmental economics, global warming Tags: climate alarmists
The green paradox illustrated: German brown coal mined like there is no tomorrow to beat #EndCoal
01 Oct 2018 Leave a comment
in energy economics, environmental economics, global warming
The Green Paradox: A Supply-side View of the Climate Problem Hans-Werner Sinn
At https://www.cesifo-group.de/ifoHome/publications/docbase/DocBase_Content/WP/WP-CESifo_Working_Papers/wp-cesifo-2015/wp-cesifo-2015-06/12012015005385.html
Used to be crocodiles in Greenland
23 Sep 2018 Leave a comment
in environmental economics, global warming Tags: climate alarmists
Where Are All the Electric Airplanes?
23 Sep 2018 Leave a comment
in energy economics, entrepreneurship, environmental economics, global warming, transport economics
Bond market fraud by climate alarmists; lying about the security of their seafront tax base
09 Sep 2018 Leave a comment
in economics of crime, environmental economics, financial economics, global warming, law and economics, politics - USA, Public Choice, rentseeking

Richard Epstein in https://www.forbes.com/sites/richardepstein/2018/01/22/global-warming-and-bond-offerings/#24ae25c423c0
#EndOil isn’t putting investors off oil and gas shares
06 Sep 2018 Leave a comment
in energy economics, environmental economics, financial economics, global warming Tags: efficient markets hypothesis

But @jamespeshaw does know how little the cost of #globalwarming is to #NewZealand
06 Sep 2018 Leave a comment
in applied welfare economics, environmental economics, global warming, politics - New Zealand

.
OIA @NZprocom on fluffing #globalwarming level versus growth rate effects @oneforthedr @EricCrampton
04 Sep 2018 Leave a comment
in environmental economics, global warming, politics - New Zealand

.@NZprocom fluffs #globalwarming level effect into an annual growth rate effect? @oneforthedr @EricCrampton
04 Sep 2018 Leave a comment
in environmental economics, global warming, politics - New Zealand

The Productivity Commission failed to mention that this is a level effect, not an annual cost. It is the reduction in the global GDP between now and a certain date such as 2060 of between 0.2% to 2%. That is the loss of between a month and a year’s global GDP between now and 2100. If you want to know the annual cost, you divide that number 40. Even a cost of 2% of global GDP divided by 40 is a tiny number.







Recent Comments