Climate economics (UG): Costs of emission reduction
15 Sep 2017 Leave a comment
in applied price theory, applied welfare economics, environmental economics, global warming
Is renewable energy the future? @GreenpeaceNZ @OxfamNZ @YoungGreensNZ
08 Sep 2017 Leave a comment
in energy economics, environmental economics
UN Climate Panel says climate impact is small @GreenpeaceNZ @OxfamNZ @YoungGreensNZ
08 Sep 2017 Leave a comment
in energy economics, environmental economics, global warming
So @Greenpeacenz @NZGreens @Oxfamnz want to stop carbon emissions by 2021?
07 Sep 2017 Leave a comment
in environmental economics, global warming
Wealthier is healthier
01 Sep 2017 Leave a comment
in development economics, economic history, environmental economics, global warming
Climate economics (UG): Adaptation policy
30 Aug 2017 Leave a comment
in applied price theory, applied welfare economics, development economics, environmental economics, global warming, growth disasters, growth miracles
An underreported IPCC consensus
21 Aug 2017 Leave a comment
in environmental economics, global warming Tags: climate alarmism

Is ethical investing a dud? @NZSuperFund @JordNZ @EricCrampton @GreenpeaceNZ
17 Aug 2017 1 Comment
in defence economics, environmental economics, financial economics, health economics, politics - New Zealand
Imagine how much more would be available for funding old age pensioners, schools, hospitals and kidney machines if you have a passively invested portfolio rather than an ethically invested portfolio. Virtue signalling is not free. Ethical investing significantly underperforms the market even if done by the best of the passive investing funds such as Vanguard.

Bjorn Lomborg explains why Paris Climate Treaty doesn’t solve Global Warming
10 Aug 2017 Leave a comment
in economics, environmental economics, global warming Tags: climate alarmists
So @Greenpeace only supports free speech when it is sued for lying @GreenpeaceNZ
31 Jul 2017 Leave a comment
in environmental economics, environmentalism, law and economics, politics - USA

Source: ExxonSecrets Factsheet.
Why is the reduction in GDP levels so small? @GreenpeaceNZ @Oxfamnz
30 Jul 2017 Leave a comment
in applied welfare economics, climate change, economic growth, energy economics, environmental economics, global warming
The global reduction in the level of GDP between now and 2060 is estimated to range between 0.6% and 4.4% if nothing is done. In the case of developing countries undergoing growth miracles, we are all talking about 6 months GDP growth! Russia and Canada will be overrun by tourists in the event of runaway climate change.

Source: The Economic Consequences of Climate Change The damages from selected climate change impacts to 2060 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264235410-5-en



Recent Comments