Hillary Clinton on sexual assault issues: Crusader or hypocrite? | FACTUAL FEMINIST
23 Feb 2018 Leave a comment
in discrimination, economics of crime, economics of education, gender, law and economics, politics - USA Tags: 2016 presidential election, political correctness
Why anti-discrimination laws shouldn’t apply to religion. It sanitises religion, drags it into the Age of Enlightenment, kicking and screaming.
22 Feb 2018 Leave a comment
in discrimination, economic history, economics of religion Tags: antidiscrimination laws, Freedom of religion, gay marriage, political correctness
Are gender specific toys a hazard to children? | FACTUAL FEMINIST
20 Feb 2018 Leave a comment
in discrimination, economics of education, gender, labour economics Tags: gender gap, political correctness
Bigots, left or right, differ in their targets of opportunity, but deep down all are miserable sods looking for someone to bully, abuse and hate
16 Feb 2018 Leave a comment
in discrimination, population economics, Public Choice Tags: moral psychology, personality psychology, political psychology
Gender equality paradox in STEM education
16 Feb 2018 Leave a comment
in discrimination, economics of education, gender, human capital, labour economics, occupational choice Tags: gender wage gap
Women can say things about the gender wage gap that men cannot
16 Feb 2018 Leave a comment
in discrimination, economics of love and marriage, gender, labour economics
Will this be the workplace of the future or already today?
12 Feb 2018 Leave a comment
in discrimination, gender, managerial economics, organisational economics
Laura Kipnis: Political Correctness is Now Eating the Left Too
11 Feb 2018 Leave a comment
in discrimination, economics of education, gender, law and economics Tags: free speech, political correctness
A Women of Color Healing Retreat in Costa Rica; yoga, vegan food, political education seminars and a ban on white people
10 Feb 2018 Leave a comment
in discrimination Tags: political correctness
#MeToo: Movement or witch hunt? | FACTUAL FEMINIST
10 Feb 2018 Leave a comment
in discrimination, economics of crime, gender, health and safety, law and economics Tags: political correctness
Started out well, but what about these days?
04 Feb 2018 Leave a comment
in discrimination, economic history, gender, labour economics Tags: feminism, feminist
How Musicians Smashed Racial Barriers
02 Feb 2018 Leave a comment
in discrimination, economic history, entrepreneurship, industrial organisation, survivor principle
Firing Line – Thomas Sowell w/ William F. Buckley Jr. (1981)
27 Jan 2018 Leave a comment
in applied price theory, comparative institutional analysis, development economics, discrimination, economic history, economics of education, economics of regulation, human capital, labour economics Tags: racial discrimination, Thomas Sowell
Did banning alcohol in 1837 fit in with deliberate genocide?
25 Jan 2018 Leave a comment
in discrimination, health economics, politics - Australia, Public Choice
Laws banning the sale of alcohol to aboriginals were first passed in 1837. Later that century the ban was extended to opium. In time, all states and territories banned the sale of alcohol to aboriginals.
Australia figures prominently in the Journal of Genocide Research. The black armband theory of Australian history alleges genocidal intent towards Australian aboriginals by the state and territory protectors of aboriginals and their accomplices. Then why the ban on alcohol and the opium?
There were strong temperance movements in Australia in the first half of the 20th century. They achieved considerable political success. Their intention was to save their fellow Australians from the demon drink.
Why then was a policy of alcohol prohibition extended to aboriginals when the state protectors aboriginals were apparently according to the black armband theory of history practising genocide?
A credible theory must make risky predictions and strictly forbid certain things if its fundamental thesis is valid. Temperance movements were well-intentioned attempts to save their fellow man and, in particular, husbands and sons. The pubs closed at 6 for white Australians and were not open at all for aboriginals.
Why was this well-intentioned policy to save people from the demon drink extended to aboriginals in an era of genocide against aboriginals? Certainly, genocidal governments of that time would have known that binge drinking would have helped kill off the aboriginal people. Did they just miss a step? Keep missing that step from 1837 until 1972?
Something does not add up here? Drinking was seen as a serious social evil. The supposedly otherwise genocidal state and territory protectors of aboriginals sought to protect aboriginals from this serious social evil.
Genocidal state and territory protectors of aboriginals, if it is true they were intent on a genocide, must be expected to do little or nothing to promote aboriginal welfare. Yet they sought bans on alcohol and opium.
Utopia, you are standing in it! 
Recent Comments