Will @NZLabour have any list MPs in 2017 after deal with @NZGreens?

There is a memorandum of understanding agreed yesterday between the New Zealand Labour Party and the New Zealand Greens. There is some speculation that there will be more coordination over electorate votes so that the Labour Party wins more electorate seats.

Labour has five list MPs at the moment. Winning a few more electorate seats will mean that the leader of the party and a future leader may be out of parliament if there is more tactical voting.

Unless this tactical voting leads to an overhang in parliament with Labour holding more electoral seats than it is entitled to on the basis of its party vote, it seems to be shooting itself in the foot.

Split voting analysis for the Greens in the 2014 election

Split voting analysis suggests there are not a lot of blue green National voters. Few Green Party voters split their party vote and give their electorate vote to National with the exception of tactical voting in Epsom. The Greens and Labour fight for the left-wing vote and that’s about it.

image

Source: The Electoral Commission.

In the electorate of Epsom, many Green voters voted for the National candidate as a tactical ploy to defeat the ACT party candidate.

image

Source: The Electoral Commission.

In Wellington Central, the National Party won the party vote with 14,689 party votes. The Greens came second with 11,545. The deputy leader of the Labour Party, Grant Robertson, came a miserable third in the party vote with 9,306 party votes.

image

Source: The Electoral Commission.

Grant Robinson nonetheless won the seat easily on Green electorate seat votes and more than a few National Party electorate votes.

Indeed, so many of Grant Robinson’s votes came from Greens and National voters that the Greens have a good chance of winning Wellington Central if they tried. More so now that the Green Party leader stands in the seat.

The Greens need to win Wellington Central in the election after they go into a coalition with Labour in government  in New Zealand because of the 40% drop in green votes every time they go into government everywhere else.

The Greens have a party vote of 10.7% at the moment. Some of that are Labour voters parking their vote with them while they’re grumpy. A significant part of the rest will be lost when they go into government. Enough of that party vote is risk to push the Greens below the 5% threshold necessary to win any list seats in Parliament.

Mixed-Member Proportional Representation Explained

Will the Labour Party have any list MPs after the 2017 general election – updated?

A constant source of speculation prior to the 2014 general election in New Zealand was whether the Labour Party would win enough of the party vote to have any list MPs at all.

Will the Labour Party have any list MPs in the 2017 election if the Conservative party were to get into Parliament under the MMP system? The following tables are scenarios using the 2014 general election results as the base.

Table 1: status quo – 2014 New Zealand general election actual results

Party name Party Votes won Party seat entitlement No. of electorate seats won No. of list MPs Total MPs   % of MPs
ACT New Zealand 0.69% 1 1 0 1   0.83%
Green Party 10.70% 14 0 14 14   11.57%
Labour Party 25.13% 32 27 5 32   26.45%
Māori Party 1.32% 2 1 1 2   1.65%
National Party 47.04% 60 41 19 60   49.59%
New Zealand First Party 8.66% 11 0 11 11   9.09%
United Future 0.22% 0 1 0 1 * 0.83%
Totals 93.76% 120 71 50 121   100.00%

 

Table 2: Conservative Party wins electorate seat at expense of National Party

Party name Party Votes won Party seat entitlement No. of electorate seats won No. of list MPs Total MPs   % of MPs
ACT New Zealand 0.69% 1 1 0 1   0.83%
Conservative 3.97% 5 1 4 5   4.13%
Green Party 10.70% 13 0 13 13   10.74%
Labour Party 25.13% 31 27 4 31   25.62%
Māori Party 1.32% 2 1 1 2   1.65%
National Party 47.04% 57 40 17 57   47.11%
New Zealand First Party 8.66% 11 0 11 11   9.09%
United Future 0.22% 0 1 0 1 * 0.83%
Totals 97.73% 120 71 50 121   100.00%

If the Conservative Party were to win an electorate seat at the expense of the National Party, three of their five seats will come off the column of the National Party, one from the Greens, and one from Labour.

The Conservative party would have held the balance of power in the New Zealand Parliament, mostly the expense of the National Party.

Table 3: Conservative Party wins electorate seat at expense of Labour Party

Party name Party Votes won Party seat entitlement No. of electorate seats won No. of list MPs Total MPs   % of MPs
ACT New Zealand 0.69% 1 1 0 1   0.83%
Conservative 3.97% 5 1 4 5   4.13%
Green Party 10.70% 13 0 13 13   10.74%
Labour Party 25.13% 31 26 5 31   25.62%
Māori Party 1.32% 2 1 1 2   1.65%
National Party 47.04% 57 41 16 57   47.11%
New Zealand First Party 8.66% 11 0 11 11   9.09%
United Future 0.22% 0 1 0 1 * 0.83%
Totals 97.73% 120 71 50 121   100.00%

If the Conservative party were to win an electoral seat at the expense of the Labour Party, the National party does no better. It still loses three MPs. The Greens lose one MP; the Labour Party also loses a list MP.

Table 4: Conservative party reaches 5% threshold expense of the party vote of New Zealand First

Party name Party Votes won Party seat entitlement No. of electorate seats won No. of list MPs Total MPs   % of MPs
ACT New Zealand 0.69% 1 1 0 1   0.83%
Conservative 5.00% 6 0 6 6   4.96%
Green Party 10.70% 13 0 13 13   10.74%
Labour Party 25.13% 31 27 4 31   25.62%
Māori Party 1.32% 2 1 1 2   1.65%
National Party 47.04% 58 41 17 58   47.93%
New Zealand First Party 7.63% 9 0 9 9   7.44%
United Future 0.22% 0 1 0 1 * 0.83%
Totals 97.73% 120 71 50 121   100.00%

The Conservative party getting to 5% does a little better for the National Party. The National Party loses two list MPs, with the Greens losing one list MP as does the Labour Party.

Bumping up the party vote of the Conservative party by 1.03% wins two list MPs at the expense of New Zealand First! Such are the comings and goings of MMP.

Table 5: the Conservative Party reaches 5% threshold at the expense of the National Party

Party name Party Votes won Party seat entitlement No. of electorate seats won No. of list MPs Total MPs   % of MPs
ACT New Zealand 0.69% 1 1 0 1   0.83%
Conservative 5.00% 6 0 6 6   4.96%
Green Party 10.70% 13 0 13 13   10.74%
Labour Party 25.13% 31 27 4 31   25.62%
Māori Party 1.32% 2 1 1 2   1.65%
National Party 46.01% 56 41 15 56   46.28%
New Zealand First Party 8.66% 11 0 11 11   9.09%
United Future 0.22% 0 1 0 1 * 0.83%
Totals 97.73% 120 71 50 121   100.00%

If the Conservative party reaches the 5% threshold to qualify for list MPs at the next election at the expense of the party vote of the National Party, the National Party is now four MPs short of what it won in the 2014 general election in order to elect six Conservative MPs.

It seems the National Party was right in not easing the path of the Conservative Party into Parliament at the last election. Most of the Conservative Party MPs would come at the expense of the National Party and would have delivered a more complicated post-election coalition scenario.

The Conservative Party is next to no threat to the size of the Labour Party caucus, and the number of list MPs it might win at the next election.

Table 6: the Conservative party reaches 5% at the expense of the National Party and the National Party vote drops by a further 1% in favour of the Labour Party

Party name Party Votes won Party seat entitlement No. of electorate seats won No. of list MPs Total MPs   % of MPs
ACT New Zealand 0.69% 1 1 0 1   0.83%
Conservative 5.00% 6 0 6 6   4.96%
Green Party 10.70% 13 0 13 13   10.74%
Labour Party 26.13% 32 27 5 32   26.45%
Māori Party 1.32% 2 1 1 2   1.65%
National Party 45.01% 55 41 14 55   45.45%
New Zealand First Party 8.66% 11 0 11 11   9.09%
United Future 0.22% 0 1 0 1 * 0.83%
Totals 97.73% 120 71 50 121   100.00%

Only when the National Party’s vote drops towards 45% does the Conservative Party become its knight in shining armour, delivering an absolute majority in Parliament.

One reason that the National Party did not endorse the Conservative Party is such an endorsement would have put off socially liberal National Party voters. Letting that Conservative Party get into Parliament under its own steam does not risk that stigma.

When the Conservative Party is elected into Parliament under its own steam because of disenchantment with the National Party, as happens with all third term governments, the Conservative Party will deliver a fourth term to the National Party, as shown in Table 6.

The National Party have nothing to gain and something to lose in terms of party votes by endorsing the Conservative Party, and a lot to gain by letting it win seats in Parliament on its own merits.

Table 7: National Party’s party vote drops to 44%

Party name

Party Votes won

Party seat entitlement

No. of electorate seats won

No. of list MPs

Total MPs

 

% of MPs

ACT New Zealand

0.69%

1

1

0

1

 

0.83%

Conservative

5.00%

6

0

6

6

 

4.96%

Green Party

10.70%

13

0

13

13

 

10.74%

Labour Party

27.13%

33

26

7

33

 

27.27%

Māori Party

1.32%

2

1

1

2

 

1.65%

National Party

44.01%

54

42

12

54

 

44.63%

New Zealand First Party

8.66%

11

0

11

11

 

9.09%

United Future

0.22%

0

1

0

1

*

0.83%

Totals

97.73%

120

71

50

121

 

100.00%

Table 7 puts forward one scenario where the National party’s party vote drops 44%. In this scenario, the National Party will need both the Conservative Party and another party, such as ACT to pass legislation.

Why New Zealanders support MMP

Most people seem to give the same reason to me in conversations as to why they support the MMP voting system – Mixed Member Proportional representation.

The reason is profoundly democratic: their party vote always counts no matter where they live in the country or how safe or how marginal the local electorate might be.

Under first past the post, it didn’t matter who you voted for if you lived in a safe electorate because the local MP of whatever political party would always be elected.

What is underplayed in these conversations is how close all elections are in New Zealand, and how likely it is that your vote might be decisive rather than just one of millions.

Under MMP, the last seat in Parliament is a contest between several parties. If anyone just gets a couple of dozen more votes, they get another seat.

In the current parliament of 121, the National Party Government has 59 seats, with the ACT party one seat and the United Future Party one seat.

One more seat for ACT or one less seat for the National Party would have made a big difference to the election outcome. ACT was only 45 votes short of getting that second seat in the 2011 General Election.

Note: Under MMP, the New Zealand House of Representatives is a mix of MPs from single-member electorates
and those elected from a party list, and a Parliament in which a party’s share of the seats roughly mirrors its share of the overall nationwide party vote. There is a minimum party vote threshold to get into Parliament. The party votes of those parties with less than 5% of the party vote do not count unless they win a constituency seat.

the beauty of proportional voting is that even if they don’t vote for you, you’ll probably still get in.

HT: Kiwiblog

Video

Bassett, Brash & Hide

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

Truth on the Market

Scholarly commentary on law, economics, and more

The Undercover Historian

Beatrice Cherrier's blog

Matua Kahurangi

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

Temple of Sociology

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

Velvet Glove, Iron Fist

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

Why Evolution Is True

Why Evolution is True is a blog written by Jerry Coyne, centered on evolution and biology but also dealing with diverse topics like politics, culture, and cats.

Down to Earth Kiwi

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

NoTricksZone

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

Homepaddock

A rural perspective with a blue tint by Ele Ludemann

Kiwiblog

DPF's Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003

The Dangerous Economist

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

Watts Up With That?

The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change

The Logical Place

Tim Harding's writings on rationality, informal logic and skepticism

Doc's Books

A window into Doc Freiberger's library

The Risk-Monger

Let's examine hard decisions!

Uneasy Money

Commentary on monetary policy in the spirit of R. G. Hawtrey

Barrie Saunders

Thoughts on public policy and the media

Liberty Scott

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

Point of Order

Politics and the economy

James Bowden's Blog

A blog (primarily) on Canadian and Commonwealth political history and institutions

Science Matters

Reading between the lines, and underneath the hype.

Peter Winsley

Economics, and such stuff as dreams are made on

A Venerable Puzzle

"The British constitution has always been puzzling, and always will be." --Queen Elizabeth II

The Antiplanner

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

Bet On It

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

History of Sorts

WORLD WAR II, MUSIC, HISTORY, HOLOCAUST

Roger Pielke Jr.

Undisciplined scholar, recovering academic

Offsetting Behaviour

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

JONATHAN TURLEY

Res ipsa loquitur - The thing itself speaks

Conversable Economist

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

The Victorian Commons

Researching the House of Commons, 1832-1868

The History of Parliament

Articles and research from the History of Parliament Trust

Books & Boots

Reflections on books and art

Legal History Miscellany

Posts on the History of Law, Crime, and Justice

Sex, Drugs and Economics

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

European Royal History

Exploring the Monarchs of Europe

Tallbloke's Talkshop

Cutting edge science you can dice with

Marginal REVOLUTION

Small Steps Toward A Much Better World

NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert”. - J Robert Oppenheimer.

STOP THESE THINGS

The truth about the great wind power fraud - we're not here to debate the wind industry, we're here to destroy it.

Lindsay Mitchell

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

Alt-M

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

croaking cassandra

Economics, public policy, monetary policy, financial regulation, with a New Zealand perspective

The Grumpy Economist

Celebrating humanity's flourishing through the spread of capitalism and the rule of law

International Liberty

Restraining Government in America and Around the World