Syria’s war: Who is fighting and why
20 Mar 2018 Leave a comment
in defence economics, war and peace Tags: Syrian Civil War
Syria: Seven years of war explained
19 Mar 2018 Leave a comment
in defence economics, war and peace Tags: Syrian Civil War
How Syria’s Kurds are trying to create a democracy
16 Mar 2018 Leave a comment
in constitutional political economy, defence economics, Public Choice, war and peace Tags: Kurds, Syrian Civil War
Syria’s war: Who is fighting and why [Updated]
04 May 2017 Leave a comment
in defence economics Tags: Syrian Civil War
By the Atlas of prejudice
11 Apr 2017 Leave a comment
in defence economics, war and peace Tags: Middle-East politics, Syrian Civil War
Syria’s war: Who is fighting and why
08 Apr 2017 Leave a comment
in defence economics, war and peace Tags: Middle-East politics, Syrian Civil War
Trump’s Syria Strike Won’t Solve Any Problems But Could Make Everything Worse
08 Apr 2017 Leave a comment
in defence economics, war and peace Tags: Syrian Civil War
.@DrJillStein wants Assad win #SyrianCivilWar #usefulidiots #peaceoffensive
17 Oct 2016 Leave a comment
in defence economics, politics - USA, war and peace Tags: 2016 presidential election, Leftover Left, Middle-East politics, Syrian Civil War
Source: Stein Opposes Obama’s Troops on the Ground in Syria – Jill2016 via The Strange Sympathy of the Far Left for Putin
Would ceasefires have shortened WWII? The American Civil War? #Syrianconflict
22 Sep 2016 Leave a comment
in defence economics, politics - USA, war and peace Tags: American Civil War, game theory, Middle-East politics, Syrian Civil War, World War II
Edward Luttwak in his essay Give War a Chance speculated that if there was a United Nations in the 1860s, there would still be UN peacekeepers stationed between the warring Union and Confederate troops on the Mason Dixon line as of this day.
If you can work out a way in which ceasefires would have shorten World War II in either the European or Pacific theatres, you have got a better crystal ball than me.
There were long interludes on the Western front; several years in which the Nazis fortified the French beaches while the Allies built up their invasion force in England. For all practical purposes, there is a land-forces ceasefire from Dunkirk to D-Day across the English Channel.
Luttwak wrote that cease-fires permit space for both sides to heal while only intensifying and prolonging the struggle once the cease fire ends — and it almost always ends.
This was true in the Arab-Israeli War of 1948-1949. It is true of the dozen of ceases fires in Gaza negotiated by the Security Council. It was true of all the cease-fires that failed in the fall of Yugoslavia with Serbs, Croats, and Bosnians who negotiated month-long cease fires where
John Stevenson studied 170 ceasefires. He pretty much vindicated the position that each side uses the lull in the fighting to regroup, rebuild and reinforce when for when the fighting starts again.
Ceasefires are perplexing in the many sided civil war in Syria. Aside from the Kurds, it is hard to work out who you want to win.
The Kurds just want to be left alone with their own country.
But Turkey is not happy about that prospect nor is Iraq.
A useful guide to Who's Who in the Syrian Civil War. And how many fighter they have.
Chart by @EP_ThinkTank https://t.co/oGbN4A67w0—
Paul Kirby (@paul1kirby) February 09, 2016
You can work out who you want to lose territory but as for who might replace them, maybe the free Syrian army is a bit of an improvement.
Who's Fighting in Syria
(or: Why more intl focus won't fix this) https://t.co/RLo7kTtyK5—
ian bremmer (@ianbremmer) November 15, 2015
There will be a bloodbath in reprisals if any of the other sides win apart from the Kurds. The Kurds are only willing to fight as far into Syria as they need to defend their own territory.
Who is fighting whom in Syria?
10 Sep 2016 Leave a comment
in defence economics Tags: Syrian Civil War
@NZGreens very sane compared to @DrJillStein @GreenPartyUS
08 Aug 2016 1 Comment
in defence economics, laws of war, politics - New Zealand, politics - USA, war and peace Tags: 2016 presidential elections, Left-wing hypocrisy, Middle-East politics, peace movements, Syrian Civil War, useful idiots
Jill Stein managed to denounce American imperialism without mentioning the invasion of the Crimea and Russian intervention in the Syrian Civil War to prop up the old regime.
Stein is what Orwell called a renegade liberal. Progressives hunt the world for dictators to worship. As George Orwell said in 1941
Pacifism is objectively pro-Fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side you automatically help that of the other. Nor is there any real way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. In practice, ‘he that is not with me is against me’.




Recent Comments