.
The east coast of the U.S. at night
10 Mar 2015 Leave a comment
What’s the point of buying a driverless Mercedes if you can’t be seen inside it (and driving it)!?
09 Mar 2015 Leave a comment
This question should be asked more often about the regulation of purported natural monopolies
09 Mar 2015 Leave a comment
The Beatles at the Cavern Club, 1961
09 Mar 2015 Leave a comment
1st amphibious car?
08 Mar 2015 Leave a comment
In Defense of Paranormal Debunking – Part I: Bayesian Self-Defense
08 Mar 2015 Leave a comment

Proponents of paranormal claims often feel threatened by scientific skepticism. This is because core skeptical principles erode their scientific pretensions. Instead of trying to back up their original paranormal claims with real scientific evidence, they attempt to deflect by attacking these skeptical principles. Most of the time, they make a hatchet job arguing against principles they misunderstood to begin with. This is because skeptical principles such as extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, Occam’s razor and burden of evidence can be formally stated and defended using basic Bayesian probability theory.
One such individual is Winston Wu, who has compiled a list of thirty sections attempting to defend paranormal claims and attack scientific skepticism. Wu attempts to offer a series of refutations to what he sees as thirty core scientific skeptical positions. Half of them deal with overarching objections to paranormal assertions and discuss topics such as burden of evidence, extraordinary claims…
View original post 3,405 more words


Recent Comments