This is one of the most common arguments that I hear from creationists. The claim is that if evolution is true, then in the fossil record we should see lots of intermediate species. In other words, we should see transitional fossils showing the changes from one group of organisms to the next. So far, we are on the right track. Evolution certainly does make that prediction. The problem is that creationists then proceed to make the factually incorrect claim that no transitional fossils have ever been found. The reality is that we have hundreds of transitional fossils, and examining them not only provides extremely strong evidence for evolution, but it shows a critical logical flaw in creationists’ thinking.
First, it is important to realize that the definition of “transitional fossil” is totally arbitrary. Any species that does not go extinct is an intermediate. In other words, evolution generally does not…
View original post 3,205 more words
Mar 10, 2015 @ 15:27:15
Hmm I’m not sure what to believe anymore…
I’ve been doing a bit of research and I’m thinking the scientists got it wrong….again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XitbLp8L6Bk
There’s a couple hours of video there so watch it when you got the time. There’s plenty others
The video is about how dinosaurs aka dragons walked with man. Includes accounts from Heroditus, Marco Polo, Alexander The Great, Aristotle, Pline, ancient pottery, carvings, paintings from numerous continents, civilizations, time periods, historical texts
LikeLike