Those who have been following this series know the drill. Viscount Monckton is replying to my Recognition statements. I respond in bold. If he has further contributions they will be in italics. The previous posts in this series are here, here, here and here.
4. Conventional physics accurately describes how greenhouse gas concentrations can contribute to warming.
(VM): “Once again, the question is not expressed quantitatively and cannot, therefore, be answered definitively in scientific terms. It is trivially true that adding a greenhouse gas to an atmosphere such as ours will – all other things being equal – be expected to cause some warming. The results of Tyndall’s experiment are not up for repeal.
TF: Again, given the nature of the climate debate I do not think this is trivial. You and I are both called ‘deniers’ because the alarmists maintain that we do not…
View original post 726 more words
Utopia, you are standing in it! 
Jun 12, 2015 @ 16:35:36
Jim,
Monkton doesn’t even understand autocorrelation and isn’t a Lord.
you demean yourself with this guff. and the uselss tripe from WUWT
LikeLiked by 1 person