The Comey Defense: Redefining Both The Law and The Leak To Oppose Donald Trump


440px-Comey-FBI-PortraitBelow is my column in The Hill Newspaper on the legal analysis surrounding the disclosure by former FBI Director James Comey that he leaked damaging information against President Donald Trump in memos to the press.  I have been surprised by the analysis which has been both artificially narrow or outright erroneous on the underlying legal issues.  There was an early effort, for example, to judge the lawfulness of Comey’s actions solely on the basis of whether it was a crime.  If these memos were government property, a claim for criminal conduct could be made but it would be unlikely under existing precedent.  However, that does not mean that Comey’s conduct was either lawful or professional. Neither is true.  In the rush to lionize Comey, the media is ignoring the fact that others have been punished for releasing non-public information to the media. Moreover, Comey and the FBI was tasked with…

View original post 2,291 more words

This entry was posted in economics on by .

About Jim Rose

Utopia - you are standing in it promotes a classical liberal view of the world and champion the mass flourishing of humanity through capitalism and the rule of law. The origin of the blog is explained in the first blog post at

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.