The Reserve Bank surveys households and businesses for their inflation expectations. As you’d expect, expectations have shifted recently with the rise in the CPI.
But households and businesses have parted ways in the long term outlook. Households think inflation five years from now will still be at 5%. That is up 2% from a year ago.
Businesses disagree. They think inflation five years from now will be 2.3%, and 2.1% in ten years. Businesses have shifted their view by only 0.3% and 0.1% respectively in the last 12 months for those 5- and 10-year timeframes. This is good.
| Households Inflation Expectations M13 | |||
| Dec 2020 | Dec 2021 | ∆ | |
| 1 year ahead – median | 2.2% | 4.0% | +1.8% |
| 1 year ahead – mean | 2.8% | 4.5% | +1.7% |
| 5 years ahead – median | 3.0% | 5.0% | +2.0% |
| 5 years ahead – mean | 4.3% | 5.6% | +1.3% |
| Businesses Annual CPI Growth Expectations M14 | ||
| Dec 2020 | Dec 2021 | ∆ |
View original post 24 more words
The looming uncertainty around Johnson’s term in office is not just a perfect setting for political intrigue, but may also have something to offer to students of constitutional law. It should draw our attention to one of the fundamental questions of the UK constitutional process – how should we choose or remove a Prime Minister between general elections? The constitutional theory is straightforward. To become a Prime Minister, an MP must enjoy the confidence of the majority of the members of the House of Commons. Constitutionally, therefore, Parliament, not the electorate, selects the PM for appointment by the Queen. Hence, the House of Commons as a whole should remove and select the PM. According to this theory, then, Johnson would be removed if he loses a vote of confidence on the floor of the House of Commons. The classical formulation is neat but incomplete. Most importantly, it does not take…






Caution – alarmist brainwashers at work. Never mind the ‘unrealistic’ climate models.
Recent Comments