
#MedicareForAll @AOC @BernieSanders @SenWarren
31 Jan 2020 Leave a comment
in economics of regulation, health economics, income redistribution, industrial organisation, politics - USA, Public Choice, public economics, rentseeking Tags: 2020 presidential election, Canada, health insurance, offsetting behaviour, The fatal conceit, unintended consequences

#endoil @Greenpeace @Greens @NZGreens #globalwarming #climateemergency
31 Jan 2020 Leave a comment
in energy economics, environmental economics, global warming, politics - Australia, politics - New Zealand, politics - USA Tags: The fatal conceit

New paper : News Driven Business Cycles: Insights and Challenges
31 Jan 2020 Leave a comment
I posted on my “current work” page a new paper with Paul Beaudry “News Driven Business Cycles: Insights and Challenges“. As written in the abstract,
There is a widespread belief that changes in expectations may be an important independent driver of economic fluctuations. The news view of business cycles offers a formalization of this perspective. In this paper we discuss mechanisms by which changes in agents’ information, due to the arrival of news, can cause business cycle fluctuations driven by expectational change, and we review the empirical evidence aimed at evaluating its relevance. In particular, we highlight how the literature on news and business cycles offers a coherent way of thinking about aggregate fluctuations, while at the same time we emphasize the many challenges that must be addressed before a proper assessment of its role in business cycles can be established.
Key Words are “News”, “Business…
View original post 10 more words
Straw Men in the Religious Discrimination debate
31 Jan 2020 1 Comment
An article in the Sydney Morning Herald (“Religious discrimination bill gives Australians ‘right to be a bigot'”, J Ireland, SMH 30 Jan 2020) sets up a number of “straw man” arguments so that it can knock them down and claim that the proposed Religious Discrimination Bill is harmful. I disagree.
View original post 1,381 more words
Inadequately presented interviewees and an anonymous quote in BBC One Guerin report
31 Jan 2020 Leave a comment
Following on from Jeremy Bowen’s report on the US administration’s “Peace to Prosperity” plan, viewers of BBC One’s ‘News at Ten’ on January 28th were presented with a report by Orla Guerin which was introduced by presenter Huw Edwards as follows:
Edwards: “At least ten Palestinians have been injured in clashes with Israeli forces amid protests against the plan that’s been unveiled in Washington. The demonstrations in the Israeli occupied West Bank came as the Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas said that his response to the Trump deal was ‘a thousand times no’. Our international correspondent Orla Guerin has spent the day in the West Bank gauging Palestinian opinions on the plan.”
Edwards did not bother to clarify that those opinions were given – and formed – before the details of the plan had even been made public. Guerin began her report at a crossing between Palestinian Authority controlled…
View original post 577 more words
Real business cycle theory at its best
31 Jan 2020 Leave a comment
in business cycles, economic growth, human capital, industrial organisation, job search and matching, labour economics, labour supply, macroeconomics, managerial economics, occupational choice, personnel economics


The Retirement Commissioner and “ethical investment”
31 Jan 2020 Leave a comment
Presumably someone pointed the Retirement Commissioner to my post yesterday ,as I gather the online version of the triennial report now has a “Foreword”, rather than the “Forward” that appeared until yesterday. We all make mistakes, typos, and literals, but you’d suppose that well-funded government agencies would have prominent parts of high-profile documents proofread. Anyway, enough of that (perhaps rather petty) point.
One other aspect of the Commissioner’s report that caught my eye was the bit about “ethical investment”. This was prompted by the government, which had asked the Commissioner to report on
Information about the public’s perception and understanding of ethical investments
in KiwiSaver, including:
a) The kinds of investments that New Zealanders may want to see excluded
by KiwiSaver providers; and
b) The range of KiwiSaver funds with an ethical investment mandate.
As I noted yesterday, there is a make-work element to the Commissioner’s role (and…
View original post 1,741 more words
My Paper “Hayek, Hicks, Radner and Four Equilibrium Concepts” Is Now Available Online.
31 Jan 2020 Leave a comment
The paper, forthcoming in The Review of Austrian Economics, can be read online.
Here is the abstract:
Hayek was among the first to realize that for intertemporal equilibrium to obtain all agents must have correct expectations of future prices. Before comparing four categories of intertemporal, the paper explains Hayek’s distinction between correct expectations and perfect foresight. The four equilibrium concepts considered are: (1) Perfect foresight equilibrium of which the Arrow-Debreu-McKenzie (ADM) model of equilibrium with complete markets is an alternative version, (2) Radner’s sequential equilibrium with incomplete markets, (3) Hicks’s temporary equilibrium, as extended by Bliss; (4) the Muth rational-expectations equilibrium as extended by Lucas into macroeconomics. While Hayek’s understanding closely resembles Radner’s sequential equilibrium, described by Radner as an equilibrium of plans, prices, and price expectations, Hicks’s temporary equilibrium seems to have been the natural extension of Hayek’s approach. The now dominant Lucas rational-expectations equilibrium misconceives intertemporal…
View original post 128 more words
Ryugyong Hotel: North Korea’s Hotel of Doom
31 Jan 2020 Leave a comment
in defence economics, development economics, economic history, economics of bureaucracy, growth disasters, Marxist economics, Public Choice Tags: fall of communism, North Korea
The Great Leap Forward (1958-62) @BernieSanders
31 Jan 2020 Leave a comment
in economics of crime, law and economics, Marxist economics, Public Choice, public economics Tags: 2020 presidential election, useful idiots
Ross McKitrick testifies at the Canadian Senate Hearing – December 15, 2011 on #globalwarming #climateemergency
31 Jan 2020 Leave a comment
in econometerics, economics of education, economics of information, energy economics, environmental economics, global warming, law and economics, property rights, Public Choice, public economics, rentseeking Tags: climate alarmists
Bans on Plastic Bags Harm the Environment
31 Jan 2020 Leave a comment
in economics of regulation, environmental economics Tags: recycling
4 meaningless words: toxin, natural, organic, and GMO
31 Jan 2020 Leave a comment
News articles and blog posts are often full of buzzwords that are heavy on emotional impact but light on substance, and for scientific topics such as nutrition, health, medicine, and agriculture, four of the most common buzzwords are “toxins,” “natural,” “organic,” and “GMO.” These words are used prolifically and are typically stated with clear implications (“toxin” and “GMO” = bad; “natural” and “organic” = good). The problem is that these words are poorly defined and constantly misused. Their definitions are so arbitrary and amorphous that they are functionally meaningless. In other words, they do not add anything useful to a discussion without first attaching a list of qualifiers to them. They are often used in a way that shifts them into the category of what are referred to as “weasel words,” meaning that their use gives the impression that the author said something concrete and meaningful, when in fact the…
View original post 3,547 more words
DNA is DNA: The anti-GMO movement ignores basic genetics
31 Jan 2020 Leave a comment
Genetic engineering (GE) is one of the most misunderstood technological marvels we have invented. The internet is full of articles and videos denouncing the supposed evils of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) with one of the most common arguments claiming that GMOs are inherently dangerous because they alter organisms’ genetic codes. It certainly is true the GE works by altering genomes, but what this argument ignores is the undeniable fact that all of our breeding methods work by altering organisms’ genomes. We’ve been genetically modifying organisms for thousands of years, GE simply lets us do it faster and more precisely.
At this point, I can already hear people screaming at their screens, “SELECTIVE BREEDING AND GENETIC ENGINEERING AREN’T THE SAME THING!!!!!!” This is the response I get every time, often accompanied by statements about the horrors of moving genes from one organism to another. If you are tempted to have this…
View original post 3,143 more words
Recent Comments