Dr. Popper: Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Metaphysics

Uneasy Money

Introduction to Falsificationism

Although his reputation among philosophers was never quite as exalted as it was among non-philosophers, Karl Popper was a pre-eminent figure in 20th century philosophy. As a non-philosopher, I won’t attempt to adjudicate which take on Popper is the more astute, but I think I can at least sympathize, if not fully agree, with philosophers who believe that Popper is overrated by non-philosophers. In an excellent blog post, Phillipe Lemoine gives a good explanation of why philosophers look askance at falsificationism, Popper’s most important contribution to philosophy.

According to Popper, what distinguishes or demarcates a scientific statement from a non-scientific (metaphysical) statement is whether the statement can, or could be, disproved or refuted – falsified (in the sense of being shown to be false not in the sense of being forged, misrepresented or fraudulently changed) – by an actual or potential observation. Vulnerability to potentially contradictory…

View original post 5,323 more words

Advertisements

Posting this while it is still legal to criticize religious groups

Wouldn’t hibernation play a role?

Creative destruction in taxi medallions

from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/19/nyregion/nyc-taxis-medallions-suicides.html