I rarely write about media bias, but I sometimes come across stories that cry out for correction because of blatant inaccuracies.
- The New York Times asserting that government schools are “starved of funding” when taxpayer subsidies actually have skyrocketed.
- The Washington Post claiming a GOP budget included “large cuts” when spending actually would grow 3.3 percent annually.
The Economist writing about poverty in the United States, but then citing numbers that have nothing to do with poverty.- The New York Times asserting that U.S. multinationals pay little tax on foreign-source income, but forgetting to include the taxes paid to foreign governments.
- A Washington Post column blaming problems in France on “austerity” when the nation has the biggest spending burden in Europe.
- The Atlantic reporting about “steady defunding” in Washington when the federal budget has tripled (adjusted for inflation) since 1980.
- A New York Times
View original post 502 more words








One of the most dynamic queens in 16th century Europe who spent most of her youth in a country that was not her homeland, but was fighting for the right to rule England. Her name was Mary Queen of Scots, the cousin of Queen Elizabeth I. Many know of her tragic tale, but there was a man who was behind the scenes trying to guide Scotland to a brighter future. He was not married to Mary Queen of Scots, but he was influential in her life and choosing who she might marry and who she would end up divorcing. He was a politician and a religious reformer whose decisions would alter history dramatically. His name was William Maitland and he served as Mary’s secretary. He is always mentioned as a footnote in history, until now. Robert Stedall’s latest biography, “Mary Queen of Scots’ Secretary: William Maitland- Politician, Reformer, and Conspirator”…
Recent Comments