The original definition of "egregious" was "remarkably good." Literally. http://t.co/r8lUkG7NAs—
Lisa Wade, PhD (@lisawade) April 16, 2015
The original definition of egregious
15 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
in economic history, economics of media and culture Tags: economics of language, network goods
The Software That Detects When a Cat Is Messing with Your Keyboard
15 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
in cats, economics of media and culture, entrepreneurship Tags: entrepreneurial alertness
The Software That Detects When a Cat Is Messing with Your Keyboard:
priceonomics.com/the-software-t… http://t.co/6dkU6e8ors—
Priceonomics (@priceonomics) September 09, 2015
Cyber loafing is productive
14 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
in economics of media and culture Tags: cyber loafing
I discover how productive cyber loafing was when I was cut off from the Internet for 16 days at my desktop.

My usual way of working was completely interrupted. Instead of working in bursts and doing a bit of cyber loafing while recharging my batteries. I had nothing in particular to do when each spell of concentrated work came to an end. This is before you consider the fact that you integrate looking things up on the Internet while writing papers and researching blogs.

Testing out the new #catdoor
14 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
in cats, economics of media and culture Tags: cat doors
Creative destruction in laptops
13 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
in economic history, economics of media and culture, entrepreneurship Tags: creative destruction, laptops
The difference that 25 years makes. http://t.co/amfutCoLT0—
Lost In History (@SadHappyAmazing) September 11, 2015
Watch your back in Rap & Hip-Hop, look after yourself in Heavy Metal and Punk
13 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
in economic history, economics of crime, economics of media and culture, health and safety, health economics, labour economics, law and economics, Music, occupational choice Tags: crime and punishment, homicide rates, law and order, suicide
What kills popular musicians? Depends on the genre http://t.co/BTDvdWOS4F—
paulkirby (@paul1kirby) September 11, 2015
@NZGreens are so polite on Twitter @MaramaDavidson @RusselNorman @greencatherine
12 Sep 2015 1 Comment
in comparative institutional analysis, constitutional political economy, economics of media and culture, liberalism, managerial economics, organisational economics Tags: Cass Sunstein, Daily Me, information cocoons, infotopia, John Stuart Mill, Karl Popper, New Zealand Greens, Twitter, Twitter left
One of the first things I noticed when feuding on Twitter with Green MPs was how polite they were. Twitter is not normally known for that characteristic and that is before considering the limitations of 144 characters. People who are good friends and work together will go to war over email without any space limitations for the making an email polite and friendly. Imagine how easy it is to misconstrue the meaning and motivations of tweets that can only be 144 characters.

The New Zealand Green MPs in their replies on Twitter make good points and ask penetrating questions that explain their position well and makes you think more deeply about your own. Knowledge grows through critical discussion, not by consensus and agreement.

Cass Sunstein made some astute observations in Republic.com 2.0 about how the blogosphere forms into information cocoons and echo chambers. People can avoid the news and opinions they don’t want to hear.
Sunstein has argued that there are limitless news and information options and, more significantly, there are limitless options for avoiding what you do not want to hear:
- Those in search of affirmation will find it in abundance on the Internet in those newspapers, blogs, podcasts and other media that reinforce their views.
- People can filter out opposing or alternative viewpoints to create a “Daily Me.”
- The sense of personal empowerment that consumers gain from filtering out news to create their Daily Me creates an echo chamber effect and accelerates political polarisation.
A common risk of debate is group polarisation. Members of the deliberating group move toward a more extreme position relative to their initial tendencies! How many blogs are populated by those that denounce those who disagree? This is the role of the mind guard in group-think.

Sunstein in Infotopia wrote about how people use the Internet to spend too much time talking to those that agree with them and not enough time looking to be challenged:
In an age of information overload, it is easy to fall back on our own prejudices and insulate ourselves with comforting opinions that reaffirm our core beliefs. Crowds quickly become mobs.
The justification for the Iraq war, the collapse of Enron, the explosion of the space shuttle Columbia–all of these resulted from decisions made by leaders and groups trapped in “information cocoons,” shielded from information at odds with their preconceptions. How can leaders and ordinary people challenge insular decision making and gain access to the sum of human knowledge?
Conspiracy theories had enough momentum of their own before the information cocoons and echo chambers of the blogosphere gained ground.

J.S. Mill pointed out that critics who are totally wrong still add value because they keep you on your toes and sharpened both your argument and the communication of your message. If the righteous majority silences or ignores its opponents, it will never have to defend its belief and over time will forget the arguments for it.
As well as losing its grasp of the arguments for its belief, J.S. Mill adds that the majority will in due course even lose a sense of the real meaning and substance of its belief. What earlier may have been a vital belief will be reduced in time to a series of phrases retained by rote. The belief will be held as a dead dogma rather than as a living truth.
Beliefs held like this are extremely vulnerable to serious opposition when it is eventually encountered. They are more likely to collapse because their supporters do not know how to defend them or even what they really mean.

J.S. Mill’s scenarios involves both parties of opinion, majority and minority, having a portion of the truth but not the whole of it. He regards this as the most common of the three scenarios, and his argument here is very simple. To enlarge its grasp of the truth, the majority must encourage the minority to express its partially truthful view. Three scenarios – the majority is wrong, partly wrong, or totally right – exhaust for Mill the possible permutations on the distribution of truth, and he holds that in each case the search for truth is best served by allowing free discussion.

Mill thinks history repeatedly demonstrates this process at work and offered Christianity as an illustrative example. By suppressing opposition to it over the centuries Christians ironically weakened rather than strengthened Christian belief. Mill thinks this explains the decline of Christianity in the modern world. They forgot why they were Christians.
Creative destruction in pizzas
12 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
in economic history, economics of media and culture, entrepreneurship Tags: creative destruction
Pizza night? Enjoy this first. A @nytimes 1944 explanation of pizza to an unsuspecting America http://t.co/Q5vhCLaQT6—
paulkirby (@paul1kirby) September 11, 2015
Burnham Mocks Corbyn
11 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
in economics of media and culture Tags: British politics
The first mobile phone went on sale 30 years ago for…
11 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
in economic history, economics of media and culture, entrepreneurship, technological progress Tags: cell phones, creative destruction, living standards
Things not to do in other countries
11 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
in economics of media and culture Tags: cultural etiquette, travel
Creative destruction in stereos
11 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
in economic history, economics of media and culture Tags: creative destruction
https://www.facebook.com/WPROFM/photos/a.74075314092.75711.8607539092/10153286483244093/?type=1
HT: Julian Weeks
Back on the grid – 16 days without home Internet
10 Sep 2015 2 Comments
in administration, economics of media and culture
You work out how addicted you are to the Internet, and how much you are willing to pay for access to it, when you only have smart phone access to the Internet.
I lost home Internet access on the 24th and got it back a few minutes ago. Vodafone profited considerably from my lack of home Internet.
It was a bit of a saga when I was switching over to Slingshot because Woosh is going out of business.
Slingshot bought the all-important hosting rights from my main email address. If I switched away from Slingshot, we would have to have a new email address. We would have to notify several hundred people of the same including a large number of business and billing subscriptions.
Apparently I was switching over to Slingshot on the 24th because at 10:30 in the morning I was cut off by Woosh without any warning or notice.
The cable guy arrived at about noon the same day. I did know he was coming that day at the time in the morning when I was cut off by Woosh
I had some obscure texts and emails from Slingshot that switch-over day was the 24th but little beyond that as to whether I was home for the cable guy on the day.
I emailed Slingshot asking what switch over day meant but no reply. In some earlier conversation weeks previous, I was told by Slingshot that it would take three or four hours to wire my house.
The cable guy arrived and wired up the internal parts of the house with great efficiency and then found out the Chorus junction box must be behind a wall. There was a green cable leading behind a wall. That green cable was the Chorus connection to our house. Our house is wired up to the Chorus and Vodafone networks. There are two cable networks in Wellington.
Our Vodafone junction box connected to the wiring in each room. I did not know that was important when choosing Slingshot.
I needed to bring in a carpenter to build an access point to that Chorus junction box behind wall. The next morning the tradesmen spent a little over four hours building that access point that should have been built when the house was built. Building standards require access points to all the places tradesmen need access underneath the house and in walls.
Maybe there was access point originally in that wall but when the previous owner used that hidden room as a drug den to grow marijuana to prisoners at a local prison where he worked as a senior corrections manager. He may have altered the house to make the drug den more secure. Not much sense to have access points to secret drug den. This is just a hypothesis as to why there was no access point despite building standards requiring it.
The cable guy spent another four hours wiring up my house, mostly having to work on about five different junction boxes in my street and beyond to get my house wired up. The Chorus wiring into my house was unusual and shared with a number of houses in the junction boxes out on the street.
Then the big moment came: we plugged in the modem. The DSL light just kept flashing rather than staying on continuously to indicate a broadband signal.
I rang up the Slingshot helpline. They said the only explanation could be a defective modem. The cable guy checked the jack point to show that there was a DSL signal coming through. Slingshot then couriered a brand-new modem. They said it would take one to four working days to arrive!
A few days later, the new modem arrived and did not work. The DSL light is still flashing rather than solid.
I rang slingshot again. Again they were sympathetic and cast the chorus guy to come out which was booked for a Saturday. They phoned me on the Friday saying they were absolutely befuddled as to why I do not have broadband suggested it might be a problem within the house
We stayed home all Saturday because the chorus technician did not show up nor explain themselves.
I telephoned Slingshot and they say they will put a note on the job to get, and Chorus will get back to me. Slingshot promised to call me back the clock the next night to check on what was happening.
Have not heard from Chorus nor Slingshot seeing Saturday.
I telephoned slingshot on Sunday night to find out what was going. The dial-up menu talked about performing an isolation test including unplugging your alarm.
This is the first I heard of my alarm in any way interfering with the possibility of being wired up by fast broadband.
I therefore have bought in at my own expense and alarm technician to service the alarm and disconnect it.
The alarm technician said it was standard practice for Chorus to blame them for problems wiring up for broadband.
The alarm technician was very knowledgeable and established that I had a dial tone but not the sound you hear when you have fast broadband.
The phone works but has an Auckland code not a Wellington code. Telling Slingshot about that puzzle was delayed by their having a major internet outage so they were not taking calls on the helpline until it is fixed.
Some may ask why did not switch to a new broadband provider. I checked into that 24th August when I first found out there would be another few days delay.
I phoned Vodafone because they already had a fast broadband connection to the house. Their map showed that we indeed had high frequency broadband hooked up to the house but they had to send out a cable guy to wire up the house. It would take two weeks before he came. No joy there. It was more effective just to wait for the Chorus cable guy to come back after the carpentry work was finished.
The chorus guy phone this morning to say he has done something at the junction box and the DSL lights is now solid and the Internet light is flickering as it should. Back on the grid. An emotional moment.
Not having home broadband has nothing to say for it. I am not addicted to the Internet.
The Internet is valuable way of working and entertaining yourself. Why is making the best choice over and over again addictive?

Recent Comments