The Gender Pay Gap
25 May 2019 Leave a comment
in discrimination, economics of education, gender, human capital, labour economics, labour supply, occupational choice, poverty and inequality Tags: gender wage gap
Jordan Peterson – The Truth About Men & Women
25 May 2019 Leave a comment
in discrimination, economics of crime, economics of education, gender, human capital, labour economics, labour supply, law and economics, occupational choice Tags: evolutionary psychology, personality psychology
More hockey sticks
24 May 2019 Leave a comment
in development economics, economic history Tags: pessimism bias, The Great Enrichment
The Mental Health Crisis | Jonathan Haidt and Jordan Peterson
24 May 2019 Leave a comment
in economics of education, health economics
Labor Ethics | Political Philosophy with Jason Brennan
24 May 2019 Leave a comment
in applied price theory, applied welfare economics, comparative institutional analysis, development economics, economic history, economics of education, health and safety, history of economic thought, human capital, income redistribution, industrial organisation, international economics, labour economics, labour supply, law and economics, minimum wage, occupational choice, poverty and inequality, Public Choice, survivor principle, technological progress Tags: distributive justice
Defining feature of the left is taxing the rich more will pay for everything
24 May 2019 Leave a comment
Do cyclists think they’re above the law, and does it even matter?
24 May 2019 Leave a comment
in law and economics, transport economics Tags: road safety
Plastic Straw Myths
24 May 2019 Leave a comment
in economics of regulation, environmental economics, politics - New Zealand, politics - USA Tags: pessimism bias
Evolution of the British Infantry during World War 1 I THE GREAT WAR Special
24 May 2019 Leave a comment
in defence economics, war and peace Tags: World War I
Asymmetric Information and Health Insurance
24 May 2019 Leave a comment
in applied price theory, applied welfare economics, comparative institutional analysis, economics of information, entrepreneurship, health economics Tags: adverse selection, health insurance, moral hazard
Seymour should consult some American judges to avoid being denounced as a bully who speaks in inflammatory code
23 May 2019 Leave a comment
In case you missed it, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Trevor Mallard, reckons Act leader David Seymour is a bully.
The Speaker spoke on TV One’s Breakfast yesterday after publication of the review which found bullying is widespread in Parliament.
Interviewer John Campbell couldn’t resist dragging Seymour into considerations: he asked if it had been bullying or robustness, when Seymour described Green MP Golriz Ghahraman as “a real menace to freedom in this country.”
Mallard replied:
“In my opinion it did step over the line. Its not a breach of privilege because it didn’t happen in the House. It’s not a criminal offence but I think it showed poor judgement….”
Campbell: “Do you think it was bullying?”
Mallard: “Ah, yes…”
View original post 1,198 more words
Why Winston Peters should be paying heed to the outcome of Australia’s climate change election
23 May 2019 1 Comment
Winston Peters is too astute a politician to be oblivious to the outcome in what Opposition parties across the Tasman labelled the “climate change election”. Almost certainly, when he spoke in the debate of the Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill on Tuesday afternoon, he was thinking of how the Australian Federal Labor Party lost the “unloseable” election simply because it campaigned so hard on what voters assessed as too demanding, and too costly, measures to combat global warming.
How else to explain his rambling defence of NZ First’s support for the bill? It was, almost word by word, as if he could feel support for NZ First in the rural regions evaporating.
He started by asking why the House was having the debate. His answer: because the previous National government had signed up to the Paris Agreement.
He went on to say the bill fulfills…
View original post 588 more words
Jesus ‘n’ Mo ‘n’ “Islamophobia”
23 May 2019 Leave a comment
Well, here we go again: another Jesus and Mo strip that the Pakistani government will eventually deem “blasphemous,” forcing WordPress to block this post in Pakistan. So it goes:
Today’s Jesus and Mo strip, called “tax”, has this caption:
The story behind the problematic new definition of Islamophobia is here.
That story gives the definition of “Islamophobia” by the APPG (all parliamentary party group) as this:
The APPG’s definition, which was proposed in a report in November, says “Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness”.
Note the problem: conflating bigotry against Muslims with “target expression of Muslimness”, which could be Islamic doctrine itself. As the National Secular Society (NSS) reports, there are objections, expressed in an open letter to Home Secretary Sajid Javid:
The NSS’s chief executive Stephen Evans was one of a diverse range…
View original post 61 more words
Recent Comments