Rothbard on the European Union
26 Jun 2017 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in applied price theory, comparative institutional analysis, industrial organisation, international economics, Murray Rothbard Tags: customs unions, European Union, preferential trading agreements, regulatory harmonisation, trade diversion
The Myth of the Free Market Cartel | by Murray N. Rothbard
21 Jun 2017 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in applied price theory, Austrian economics, economic history, industrial organisation, Murray Rothbard Tags: cartel theory, cartels
Rate this:
Murray Rothbard – Origins Of Progressive Regulation
19 Jun 2017 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in applied price theory, Austrian economics, economic history, economics of bureaucracy, economics of regulation, Murray Rothbard, Public Choice, rentseeking Tags: interest groups, pressure groups, regulatory capture
Rate this:
Is the Trade Deficit a Problem? Murray Rothbard
01 Jun 2017 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in applied price theory, international economics, macroeconomics, Murray Rothbard Tags: trade deficits
Rate this:
Murray Rothbard on how John Kenneth Galbraith makes his case
05 Jun 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in economics of information, history of economic thought, Murray Rothbard
Who did Murray Rothbard consider America’s "best" president?
30 May 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in constitutional political economy, defence economics, economic history, Murray Rothbard, Public Choice Tags: Martin Van Buren
Rate this:
Murray Rothbard on the instability of cartels
07 May 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in applied price theory, economic history, industrial organisation, Murray Rothbard Tags: cartel theory, entrepreneurial alertness, The meaning of competition
Rate this:
Murray Rothbard vs. EU 1989!
28 Mar 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in Austrian economics, constitutional political economy, currency unions, economics, economics of bureaucracy, Euro crisis, international economics, macroeconomics, monetary economics, Murray Rothbard, Public Choice Tags: Euroland, European Union
Rate this:
The Polish Disease | Murray N. Rothbard
25 Mar 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in Austrian economics, economics, Murray Rothbard
Rate this:
The minimum wage outlaws jobs, nothing more
28 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in labour economics, minimum wage, Murray Rothbard Tags: living wage, offsetting behaviour, The fatal conceit
It's pretty simple: Minimum Wage = Compulsory Unemployment http://t.co/6xiX6YCp9Z—
Mark J. Perry (@Mark_J_Perry) July 25, 2015
Rate this:
Applied welfare economics was never value free, but applied price theory is @TimothyTTaylor
11 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in applied welfare economics, comparative institutional analysis, constitutional political economy, history of economic thought, liberalism, Murray Rothbard Tags: David Colander, Henry Hazlitt, Joan Robinson, methodology of economics
The first words uttered in my first lecture in applied welfare economics by Bob Rutherford were ‘this course starts with an explicit political position – that of liberalism’. I never forgot that.
Source: CONVERSABLE ECONOMIST: Crossing the Ravine from Economic Theory to Policy Advice.
This leads us to Robert and Zeckhauser’s taxonomy of disagreement:
Positive disagreements can be over questions of:
1. Scope: what elements of the world one is trying to understand?
2. Model: what mechanisms explain the behaviour of the world?
3. Estimate: what estimates of the model’s parameters are thought to obtain in particular contexts?
Values disagreements can be over questions of:
1. Standing: who counts?
2. Criteria: what counts?
3. Weights: how much different individuals and criteria count?
Any positive analysis tends to include elements of scope, model, and estimation, though often these elements intertwine; they frequently feature in debates in an implicit or undifferentiated manner. Likewise, normative analysis will also include elements of standing, criteria, and weights, whether or not these distinctions are recognised.
The origin of political disagreement is a broad church indeed in a liberal democracy. Those you disagree with are not evil, they just disagree with you. As Karl Popper observed:
There are many difficulties impeding the rapid spread of reasonableness. One of the main difficulties is that it always takes two to make a discussion reasonable. Each of the parties must be ready to learn from the other.



Rate this:
Abolish @StatisticsNZ @ReserveBankofNZ can collect CPI stats?!
15 Aug 2015 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in development economics, economic history, economics of bureaucracy, economics of regulation, growth miracles, inflation targeting, liberalism, macroeconomics, Milton Friedman, monetary economics, Murray Rothbard, Public Choice, rentseeking Tags: Hong Kong, The fatal conceit, The pretense the knowledge
https://twitter.com/JimRose69872629/status/632343302763773953
@PaulNVandeWater @WhitefordPeter @AEI @MichaelRStrain Hong Kong saw statistics as eyes ears of regulation, worrywartshttp://t.co/Kk5vSxQHyw
— Jim Rose (@JimRosenz) August 15, 2015
@PaulNVandeWater @WhitefordPeter @AEI @MichaelRStrain Hong Kong = bad policy!? Milton Friedman turning in his grave!http://t.co/L5zlwmw8Md
— Jim Rose (@JimRosenz) August 15, 2015
@PaulNVandeWater @WhitefordPeter @AEI @MichaelRStrain government with statsitcs until 1970s with no BOP until 1997 http://t.co/cmDgqE3yd2
— Jim Rose (@JimRosenz) August 15, 2015
Rate this:

Recent Comments