China’s North Pole – where record low temperatures plunge to -53C
29 Jan 2023 Leave a comment
Beiji Village in Mohe, China’s northernmost city [image credit : china.org.cn] The reporter here says it’s ‘so cold it feels uncomfortable in your lungs’ then goes on to speculate on possible/imagined links to global warming aka climate change. ‘Research suggests’…etc. The freezing cold air coming south from Siberia gets billed as an ‘extreme weather event’.
– – –
Mohe is known as China’s North Pole for a good reason, says Sky News.
It is the country’s most northern city and is a very, very cold place.
It’s difficult to describe what temperatures this low feel like.
On Sunday it hit -53C, a new low for the coldest temperature recorded in the country since modern monitoring began.
The National Meteorological Centre confirmed the previous record of -52.3C, set in 1969, had been beaten.
View original post 205 more words
Clear Winner: At Any Scale Safe, Reliable & Affordable Nuclear Is The Natural Energy Choice
28 Jan 2023 Leave a comment
There are 30 countries where you’ll find nearly 450 nuclear reactors currently operating – including the French, Americans, Canadians, Japanese and Chinese. Another 15 countries are currently building 60 reactors among them. Nuclear power output accounts for over 11% of global electricity production. But not a lick of it in Australia, thanks to an idiotic legislated ban put in place by a Liberal government back in 1998.
STT promotes nuclear power because it works: safe, affordable, reliable and the perfect foil for those worried about human-generated carbon dioxide gas – because it doesn’t generate any, while generating power on demand, irrespective of the weather – unlike the forever unreliables: wind and solar.
And we are not here to draw divisions on the basis of scale; large or small, nuclear plants that deliver power as and when it’s needed are the natural energy choice, in an energy-starved world.
At the smaller…
View original post 1,939 more words
Why Russia Miscalculated in Ukraine: A Self-Inflicted Disaster in Three Acts
28 Jan 2023 Leave a comment
in defence economics, war and peace Tags: Ukraine
Vote them out #3
28 Jan 2023 Leave a comment
The attempt to entrench part of the Five Waters legislation was an abuse of power and an attempt to pervert democracy.
Hansard recorded the debate attempting to undo the mess.
SIMON WATTS (National—North Shore): Thank you very much, Madam Chair. It’s a pleasure to rise to speak on Supplementary Order Paper (SOP) 310. And isn’t it ironic that we’re back here in the House when only a few—or literally last week, or the week before, we were in here under urgency undertaking a debate in the committee of the whole House stage lasting nearly 10 hours and a debate that went well into the night and bright and early in the next morning. But the fact is, we’re here today because of, basically, a significant mistake that was made on that evening. And there should be lessons that are taken from what occurred at that point from the…
View original post 751 more words
Partisan ‘Fact Checkers’ Spread Climate-Change Misinformation-Bjorn Lomborg
28 Jan 2023 Leave a comment
The Kaiser’s Birthday – Hypocrisy in Greece I THE GREAT WAR – Week 79
28 Jan 2023 Leave a comment
in defence economics, war and peace Tags: World War I
Why Didn’t the Allies Get Rid of Franco After the Second World War?
28 Jan 2023 Leave a comment
in defence economics, International law, war and peace Tags: Spain, World War II
Why did Japan refuse Poland’s declaration of war in WW2?
28 Jan 2023 Leave a comment
in defence economics, economic history, International law, war and peace Tags: Japan, Poland, World War II
Reviewing the MPC’s Remit
27 Jan 2023 Leave a comment
Once upon a time the Reserve Bank’s monetary policy was guided by a Policy Targets Agreement reached between the Governor and the Minister of Finance. These days things are different. As one of the more sensible aspects of the 2018 legislative overhaul, the new Monetary Policy Committee now works to a Remit (current one here) determined ultimately solely by the Minister of Finance. That is the way things should be: if officials are free to implement policy, the policy goals should be set by those whom we elect, in this case the Minister of Finance. At times, the Minister may put daft things in the Remit – as the current one did a couple of years back with the house price references – but that is how our system of government works (as it should).
Another sensible aspect of those reforms was a requirement that every five years or…
View original post 648 more words

Recent Comments