David I. Levine on entrepreneurial alertness and the efficient markets hypothesis
13 Nov 2014 Leave a comment
If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich: Deirdre McCloskey on economists as forecasters
10 Nov 2014 1 Comment
Average Marginal Income Tax Rates for New Zealand, 1907-2009 (WP 12/04) — The Treasury – New Zealand
07 Nov 2014 Leave a comment
in applied price theory, fiscal policy, politics - New Zealand Tags: Marginal tax rates, public economics, public finance
Note: Average marginal tax rate calculations exclude the impact of ACC levies, the Benefit system and the Family Tax Credit (FTC) system which, at various times since the 1970s, involved lump sum transfers to lower income families with children that were withdrawn at higher income levels at rates of up to 30c/$, thereby adding to effective MTRs.
Comment: The average marginal tax rate has been pretty stable in New Zealand since about 1990 excepting for a drop in the late 1990s and then an increase in 1999.
via http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/research-policy/wp/2012/12-04
The Feed the Kids Bill still leaves their parents to go hungry!
05 Nov 2014 Leave a comment
in applied price theory, economics of education, politics - New Zealand, poverty and inequality, welfare reform Tags: Heartless Left, Leftover Left, school breakfast programmes
The Feed the Kids Bill that has been reintroduced into the new New Zealand Parliament still contains no provision to feed the parents who are too poor to make their children breakfast.
Why are these hungry parents not invited for breakfast as well? No parent would have breakfast if their children was to go hungry. Both the parent and child must have gone hungry that morning, perhaps morning after morning. There is no other charitable explanation.
The Bill aims to set up government funded breakfast and lunch programmes in all decile 1-2 schools. The cost is $100 million a year – including food, staffing, administration, monitoring and evaluation.
Lindsay Mitchell was on the money when she wrote:
Even parents reliant on a benefit are paid enough to provide some fruit and modest sandwiches daily.
An inability to do so is a symptom of a greater problem requiring scrutiny – for the sake of their child.
“The ‘income management’ regime provides a response to genuinely hungry children.
It may interest you that even Labour advocated for extended income management in its election manifesto.
Their 2014 ‘Social Development’ policy paper proposed, “…allow[ing] income management to be used as a tool by social agencies where there are known child protection issues and it is considered in the best interests of the child, especially where there are gambling, drug and alcohol issues involved.”
Hungry children is a child protection issue. Parents who fail to feed their children should come to the attention of the child protection authorities. Those on the benefit should be subject to income management because they clearly are spending their money elsewhere.
On the Left, there is a refusal to discuss the role of addiction and incompetent parenting in child poverty. The 2014 election manifesto of the Labour Party is a welcome departure from that tradition of denial.
If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich: Deirdre McCloskey on economists as business consultants
05 Nov 2014 Leave a comment
Is Behavioral Economics Doomed? | Cheap Talk
04 Nov 2014 Leave a comment
in applied price theory, behavioural economics Tags: behavioural economics, David I. Levine
George Stigler on the empirical success of the 1st law of demand and why demand curves will never slope upwards
03 Nov 2014 Leave a comment
The real reason why behavioural economics is so popular among politicians and bureaucrats
03 Nov 2014 Leave a comment
in applied price theory, applied welfare economics, behavioural economics, Public Choice, rentseeking Tags: behavioural economics, do gooders, The fatal conceit, The pretence to knowledge
\
HT: David-k-Levine
Recent Comments