Utopia, you are standing in it!

Wind power has no economic value simply because it cannot be delivered as and when power consumers need it. Hence the massive and seemingly endless subsidies to a power source which is meaningless and, accordingly, worthless. In the absence of subsidies, there would be no wind industry, at all.

But worthless does not mean ‘cheap’ – pointless ‘virtue’ signalling comes with a staggering price tag.

Now that Jo Biden has got the cash to implement the Green New Deal (at its heart a self-destructive energy policy heavily promoted by Bernie Sanders and the Squad) the prospects for renewable energy rent-seekers have improved.

Which, is as good as time as any, to calculate the true costs of what’s coming.

Thomas Stacy does just that below.

Virginia’s Blackout Energy Plan (‘bloody expensive,’ says E&E News)
Master Resource
Thomas Stacy II
2 November 2021

“Get ready, blackouts and brownouts are coming,” [Glenn] Youngkin…

I recently wrote a short piece for Adam Smith Works, on the influence of David Hume on Adam Smith, in the field of trade and international politics.

You may find it here: https://www.adamsmithworks.org/speakings/van-de-haar-insights-of-david-hume

Earlier in the week I did a post that included economist (and former Victoria University academic) Martin Lally’s sketch outline of an approach to thinking about applying cost-benefit analysis techniques to Covid vaccine “mandates”. In that post I included a few suggestions, questions, and thoughts on aspects of Lally’s note and the wider issue of coercion in a Covid context.

Since then, Lally has extended his note into a fuller short paper. I offered to make it more widely available here

A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF COVID-19 VACCINE MANDATES by Martin Lally

Here is his Abstract

Abstract

Covid-19 vaccine mandates for the general population must trade off the rights of those who object to being vaccinated against the costs that the unvaccinated impose upon the vaccinated, most particularly the increased risk to vaccinated people of death by covid-19.  This paper provides a methodology for doing so.  It is then applied to…

Greenland drink break [image credit: leisurelylifestyle.com] As a bonus in today’s climate obsessed times, carbon credits could come into play for farmers to sell with this discovery. Even Danish brewers can benefit. Why fear glacier melt if it makes life better?
– – –
On a shore near Greenland’s capital Nuuk, a local scientist points to a paradox emerging as the island’s glaciers retreat: one of the most alarming consequences of global warming could deliver a way to limit its effects, says Reuters (via Yahoo News).

“It’s a kind of wonder material,” says Minik Rosing, a native Greenlander, referring to the ultra-fine silt deposited as the glaciers melt.

Known as glacial rock flour, the silt is crushed to nano-particles by the weight of the retreating ice sheet, which deposits roughly one billion tonnes of it on the world’s largest island per year.

Professor Minik Rosing and his team at…

Apocalypse Now (1979) Director: Francis Ford Coppola

“I love the smell of napalm in the morning.”

★★★★★

Originally conceived as an adaptation of Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness in Vietnam, Apocalypse Now is a haunting, terrifying, powerful portrayal of the Vietnam War by Francis Ford Coppola who takes us deep into the dark recesses of our primitive subconscious. In truth, it was a miracle that the film was even made at all; nearly everything went wrong during during production. The original title was “Apocalypse Three” but was changed by scriptwriter John Milius to poke fun at the pop culture idiom “Nirvana Now.” The initial intent was for George Lucas to direct the film as a black comedy, but after several years and a denied request to shoot the film on location in Vietnam, Lucas moved on to other projects (American Graffiti and Star Wars) and Francis Ford Coppola…

Hamlet (1948) Director: Laurence Olivier

“This is the tragedy of a man who could not make up his mind.”

★★★★★

As a follow-up to 1944’s triumphant Henry V, the writer/director/producer virtuoso Laurence Oliver returned with an absolutely iconic depiction of Hamlet in 1948 which won a string of awards including Best Picture (the first non-American film to win Best Picture) and Best Actor (Laurence Olivier), though Oliver ultimately lost Best Director to John Huston for his equally amazing film The Treasure of the Sierra Madre. In the end, Hamlet won four Academy Awards. Despite the omission of numerous characters and scenes (especially the absence of Fortinbras and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern), as well as some revisionist dialogue, this dark and brooding masterpiece comes with high praise from me –one which I have seen several times now.

Even though I am something of a Shakespeare purist, I found Olivier’s Hamlet

Apparently Stuff ran an article by Andrea Vance in last weeks Sunday Star Times accusing the Taxpayers Union of Racism and other things for opposing 3Waters. I have not seen or read this Stuff article but apparently it was spread across two pages – so was a major expose.

When the Taxpayers Unions responded with a rebuttal of the accusations Stuff refused to run it and then refused paid advertising from the Taxpayers Union when they tried to explain their position that way. Obviously Stuff are well in the Governments pocket and making sure they earn their share of the $55million plus paid by the Government.

What follows is the piece that the Taxpayers Union presented to Stuff – I have pinched it from Homepaddock because it deserves maximum exposure and I am sure she and the Taxpayers Union will not mind..

`This iswhat Stuff won’t publish:

Irresponsible…

Credit: NASA

H/T Tallbloke
– – –
By Dr. Rudolph Kalveks — As the media, politicians and climate activists continue to circulate hysterical hot air from the Cop26 conference, the topic of climate change or anthropogenic global warming (AGW) has become an emotional one, increasingly detached from the thoughtful and meticulous process of theory development, calculation and observation that is supposed to characterise scientific endeavour.

It may come as a surprise to some that “The Science”, as expounded in the IPCC Summaries for Policymakers that inform conference participants, is not uncritically accepted by all scientists in the field, and that widely different views are held by a substantial cadre of experienced and eminent researchers.

Moreover, a multitude of peer-reviewed papers contradict many aspects of the IPCC’s alarmist narrative.

Furthermore, a coherent theory about the impact of changes in greenhouse gases (GHGs) is starting to emerge, one that is built up…