Source: 24 August 2016, Most homeless people working or studying, News, University of Otago, New Zealand, table 4.
Fewer in emergency accommodation under @NZNationalParty? @PhilTwyford @cjsbishop
31 Aug 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in labour economics, politics - New Zealand, poverty and inequality, urban economics Tags: homelessness, social insurance, social safety net, welfare state
More on homelessness fell under @NZNationalParty? @CarmelSepuloni @cjsbishop
30 Aug 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in labour economics, politics - New Zealand, poverty and inequality, urban economics Tags: child poverty, family poverty, homelessness, New Zealand Greens, New Zealand Labour Party, social insurance, welfare state
I cherry picked my previous data on homelessness if the New Zealand sub-Reddit is to be believed and from which I am banned and cannot reply. Plotting the data in full is to cherry pick it. The chart below is simply the first two rows of the source data. The subsequent rows deal with those in emergency accommodation and in temporary accommodation.
Source: 24 August 2016, Most homeless people working or studying, News, University of Otago, New Zealand, table 4.
When I shared this data on Carmel Sepuloni MP’s Facebook page, she rightly and constructively said
Thanks for your comment Jim. Unfortunately the number living rough has increased since 2001. We want to focus on improving the future, which is why we are holding our homeless inquiries so we can best understand and address this issue:
Rather than pointscoring, the issue is what to do to fix the problem. How desperate is much of the rest of the Left to beat up this issue as the fault of John Key. This is an an important issue that should not be used for point scoring by sufferers of John Key derangement syndrome.
Homeless people are those who I charted above. They are sleeping rough or in a car. They have slipped through the social safety net which is obviously not working for them. If you are in emergency accommodation, the social safety net is working. The issue is making that safety net work better in terms of moving quickly into more permanent accommodation..
Poverty Has Declined a Lot Over the Past 30 Years in the USA
27 Aug 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in economic history, labour economics, labour supply, politics - USA, poverty and inequality, welfare reform Tags: 1996 US welfare reforms, child poverty, family poverty, single parents, social insurance, welfare state
Source: Poverty Has Declined a Lot Over the Past 30 Years | Mother Jones from Poverty After Welfare Reform | Manhattan Institute.
Homelessness fell under @NZNationalParty? @PhilTwyford @metiria @cjsbishop
26 Aug 2016 2 Comments
by Jim Rose in applied welfare economics, economic history, labour economics, politics - New Zealand, poverty and inequality Tags: homelessness, neoliberalism, social insurance, vast right-wing conspiracy, welfare state
People living rough doubled under Labour! Fell under the National Party led government despite the global financial crisis and the return of neoliberal oppression.
Source: 24 August 2016, Most homeless people working or studying, News, University of Otago, New Zealand, table 4.
Tom Scott on the cross-party #homelessnessinquiry in this morning's @DomPost for more: https://t.co/RMGBrc8sAP pic.twitter.com/2PP6BYHRnq
— Phil Twyford (@PhilTwyford) August 23, 2016
How many of the 41,000 homeless don’t have a roof over their heads? @metiria @PhilTwyford
25 Aug 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in applied welfare economics, labour economics, politics - New Zealand, poverty and inequality Tags: child poverty, family poverty, homelessness, social housing, social insurance, welfare state
There is a difference between not having a roof over your head and being in emergency or temporary accommodation. It disrespects those who lack a roof over their head tonight to equate their grave misfortune with those fortunate enough to already be in emergency accommodation. Once they are in emergency accommodation, that shows that the system is working. Finding them somewhere to stay pending finding something more permanent.
Source: 24 August 2016, Most homeless people working or studying, News, University of Otago, New Zealand, table 4.
We have the stats, yet NZ Herald is still loathe to admit the elephant in the room: the house prices are going up… https://t.co/cTEw5rWJrY
— Child Poverty Action (@childpovertynz) August 25, 2016
Paula Bennett says the latest independent research from Otago Uni on the scale of homelessness is wrong. #indenial https://t.co/xbMaOy7Upq
— Phil Twyford (@PhilTwyford) August 25, 2016
.
Why so few successful left-wing populists
16 Aug 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in politics - Australia, politics - New Zealand, politics - USA, Public Choice Tags: economics and immigration, growth of government, left-wing populists, right-wing populists, size of government, social insurance, welfare state
The Twitter Left is doing its best to attribute the surge against globalisation and immigration to inequality. This is despite the main beneficiary at the ballot box is right-wing populists.
The beneficiaries in the last few years were UKIP, the French National Front, Alternative for Germany, various pro-welfare state but anti-immigration parties in the rest of Europe, Pauline Hanson and Donald Trump. Barely a left wing party in sight outside of Greece.
Source: Only a third of the EU is governed by the centre-left | World news | The Guardian.
Bernie Sanders is a fake left-wing populist because much of his support comes from college students and the university educated, not the aroused working class. These college students are unwilling to pay more than $1000 in taxes for the socialist revolution especially if they have a job.
At the last New Zealand election, two-thirds of the electorate voted for other than centre-left and left-wing parties. The hard left party, Mana-Internet, won 1% of the party vote despite having millions of dollars in campaign donations from a criminal fugitive hoping to avoid extradition.
These right-wing populists combine a heady brew of nationalism and social conservatism, scepticism about market competition, strong support for social security and old-age pensions but not welfare dependency, and opposition to immigration, imports and cultural change. The rise of the parties are not the first signs of an aroused working class seeking to overthrow capitalism. Face up to it.
The effectiveness of social insurance in reducing poverty in the USA
10 Jul 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in economic history, labour economics, politics - USA, poverty and inequality Tags: child poverty, family poverty, social insurance, welfare state
Homeless means living rough or in a car @DavidReiMiller @greencatherine @secondzeit
06 Jun 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in politics - New Zealand, poverty and inequality, public economics, urban economics Tags: economics of housing, homelessness, social insurance, welfare state
Statistics New Zealand spent 21 pages trying to define the term homeless. How Orwellian.
One in 100 NZers are homeless – study https://t.co/JH3xqW2nf1
— RNZ News (@rnz_news) June 3, 2016
When I first moved to Canberra and when I moved back, I stayed with friends. Some regard that as being homeless under the Statistics New Zealand definition, much to my own surprise.
I qualify because I shared accommodation . Having shared or short-term accommodation is not homeless. The descriptions shared and short-term accommodation quite adequate to the task.
https://twitter.com/DavidReiMiller/status/739306152404471809
People living in temporary accommodation including with friends are not homeless. Their situation is unsatisfactory but describing it does not justify butchering the English language by conflating their inconveniences with the few hundred people who live rough each night.
Source: New Zealand Parliament – Homelessness in New Zealand.
Those that conflate having a roof over your head tonight with living rough take advantage of the great sympathy people have for those living rough for people in far less dire situations.
NZ #UBI can be only $4,700 @JordNZ @GrantRobertson1 @GeoffSimmonz
04 Jun 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in labour economics, labour supply, politics - New Zealand, poverty and inequality Tags: expressive voting, growth of government, New Zealand Labor Party, rational irrationality, size of government, social insurance, universal basic income, welfare state
A universal basic income in New Zealand will have to be financed by a great big new tax because the existing ones are not enough according to the Economist calculations below.
HT: Paul Kerby.
Hayek (1976) on the need for a #UBI
26 May 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in F.A. Hayek Tags: negative income tax, social insurance, universal basic income, welfare state
Milton Friedman on Neo-Liberalism and the welfare state
16 May 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in liberalism, Milton Friedman Tags: neoliberalism, offsetting behaviour, social insurance, The fatal conceit, The pretense to knowledge, welfare state
@BernieSanders nothing is free in Denmark
24 Apr 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in applied welfare economics, fiscal policy, politics - USA, public economics Tags: 2016 presidential election, Denmark, growth of government, size of government, social insurance, taxation and labour supply, welfare state
Source: Brutal Meme Reveals Truth About European Socialist Countries? : snopes.com.
How generous are unemployment benefits? See #stats & #dataviz in our #tax/benefits database https://t.co/ND9MdCF187 pic.twitter.com/jcH0XIit4m
— OECD ➡️ Better policies for better lives (@OECD) April 13, 2016
Avg hrs worked / wk
Turkey: 49
Mexico: 45
Greece: 39
USA: 39
France: 36
Germany: 35https://t.co/MD1lZBegQw pic.twitter.com/62lEcJnFC8— Max Galka (@galka_max) January 18, 2016
@BernieSanders @HillaryClinton Who is below the poverty line in America? #fightfor15
18 Apr 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in labour economics, politics - USA, poverty and inequality Tags: child poverty, family poverty, single mothers, single parents, social insurance, unemployment benefit, welfare state
@BillClinton was not triangulating on welfare reform
11 Apr 2016 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in gender, labour economics, labour supply, politics - USA, poverty and inequality, welfare reform Tags: 1996 US welfare reforms, 2016 presidential election, Bill Clinton, child poverty, family poverty, single mothers, single parents, social insurance, welfare state
Recent Comments