You think there's no poverty in Japan? Think again, folks. bloomberg.com/news/articles/… http://t.co/7yIPQsTE8H—
Noah Smith (@Noahpinion) September 13, 2015
Child poverty and single parents across the globe
18 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in labour economics, poverty and inequality, welfare reform Tags: child poverty, family poverty, single mothers, single parents, social insurance, welfare state
The 1996 US federal welfare reforms are still succeeding
13 Sep 2015 1 Comment
by Jim Rose in economic history, labour economics, labour supply, politics - USA, poverty and inequality, welfare reform Tags: 1996 US welfare reforms, social insurance, welfare state
Rate this:
Watch out! #Greypower has not finished coming to town
13 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in politics - USA, population economics, Public Choice Tags: ageing society, demographic crisis, grey power, social insurance, voter demographics
Rate this:
@arindube Paul Krugman on the minimum/living wage in 1998
11 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in labour economics, minimum wage, poverty and inequality Tags: family tax credits, living wage, minimum wage, social insurance
.@noamscheiber picks up on a new consensus in #minimumwage research on restaurant employment. http://t.co/mEvRef4GMj pic.twitter.com/4BFaFRCy2v
— Arin Dube (@arindube) July 27, 2015
.@noamscheiber picks up on a new consensus in #minimumwage research on restaurant employment. http://t.co/mEvRef4GMj pic.twitter.com/4BFaFRCy2v
— Arin Dube (@arindube) July 27, 2015
@arindube much safer to just increase the earned income tax credit. no jobs would be put at risk.http://t.co/LParULo9DM
— Jim Rose (@JimRosenz) September 11, 2015
#MinimumWage physics analogy fail "Just as no physicist would claim that 'water runs uphill'" https://t.co/V7WZuyy9U0 pic.twitter.com/xC0ipC2B1a
— Arin Dube (@arindube) August 21, 2015
Rate this:
More than 15% of unemployed Europeans haven’t had a job for more than four years
10 Sep 2015 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in currency unions, economic growth, Euro crisis, job search and matching, labour economics, labour supply, macroeconomics, poverty and inequality, unemployment, welfare reform Tags: employment law, equilibrium unemployment rate, Eurosclerosis, labour market regulation, natural unemployment rate, social insurance, unemployment duration, unemployment insurance
More than 15% of unemployed Europeans haven’t had a job for more than four years econ.st/1ghznmr http://t.co/NlLXnKPYRG—
The Economist (@TheEconomist) August 10, 2015
Rate this:
The benefits and costs of the @NZSuperFund since its inception
17 Aug 2015 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in applied price theory, applied welfare economics, economic growth, economic history, entrepreneurship, financial economics, fiscal policy, industrial organisation, labour economics, labour supply, macroeconomics, politics - New Zealand, public economics Tags: ageing society, company tax rate, deadweight cost of taxes, demographic crisis, efficient markets hypothesis, laffer curve, New Zealand superannuation fund, old age pensions, retirement savings, social insurance, sovereign wealth funds, taxation and entrepreneurship, taxation and investment, taxation and labour supply
Most mutual funds still can't beat their benchmark read.bi/1GkTig1 http://t.co/r7ezoDGJbV—
BI Chart of the Day (@chartoftheday) June 03, 2015
The New Zealand Superannuation Fund, the sovereign wealth fund part funding New Zealand’s old-age pension from 2029/2030 onwards, has been a bit of a wild ride. Sometimes the earnings of the Fund were well below and sometimes earning well above the long-term bond rate.
Source: New Zealand Superannuation Fund Annual Report 2014.
Since its inception, the Fund earned an average annual return of 9.78%, which was 5.06% above the long-term bond rate, and 1.03% above its reference portfolio.

No information was given in the annual report of the New Zealand Superannuation Fund on the marginal dead weight cost of the taxes raised to fund the New Zealand Superannuation Fund to see whether there is any net benefit to taxpayers from its establishment and continued operation.
The New Zealand Government has contributed $14.88 billion to the fund from prior its inception in 2001 to the suspension of contributions in 2009 by the incoming National Party Government.
Source: New Zealand Treasury.
Over the nine years in which contributions were made, the company tax rate of 28% could have easily been up to 10 percentage points lower.
The New Zealand Treasury estimates that a one percentage point cut in the company tax costs about $220 million in forgone revenue if there are no other changes to the tax system. These are static estimates that do not include any feedback from greater investment and higher growth.
The New Zealand Superannuation Fund must beat the market every single year to make up for the deadweight cost of its funding, a premium for the investment risk added to the Crown’s portfolio and the cost to New Zealand’s growth rate of higher than otherwise taxes on income, entrepreneurship and investment.
Source: Abolish the Corporate Income Tax – The New York Times.
Rate this:
What if French and Americans swapped working hours per year
16 Aug 2015 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in applied price theory, applied welfare economics, economic growth, fiscal policy, labour economics, labour supply, macroeconomics Tags: Eurosclerosis, Frantz, social insurance, taxation and entrepreneurship, taxation and investment, taxation and labour supply, unemployment insurance, welfare state
American workers toiled for 37 days more than their French counterparts in 2013 econ.st/1M645uQ http://t.co/faN8XtmLAW—
The World If (@EconWorldIf) August 10, 2015
Rate this:
% of unemployment that is more than 12 months, USA, UK, Germany and France
14 Aug 2015 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in currency unions, Euro crisis, job search and matching, labour economics, labour supply, macroeconomics, unemployment Tags: British economy, equilibrium unemployment rate, France, Germany, long-term unemployment, natural unemployment rate, social insurance, unemployment duration, unemployment insurance, welfare state
As the British labour market and long-term unemployment was starting to get something like that in the USA, the USA started to have unemployment it was more like the European labour markets in terms of the number of long-term unemployed. Nothing much happened in Germany and France.
Source: OECD StatExtract.
Rate this:
The minimum wage and escaping poverty across the OECD area
12 Aug 2015 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in labour economics, labour supply, minimum wage, poverty and inequality Tags: family tax credits, in-work tax credits, living wage, social insurance
Making ends meet on minimum pay – how many working hours are needed to move out of #poverty? oe.cd/12J http://t.co/96g2bUj3Ng—
OECD Publications (@OECD_Pubs) July 09, 2015
Rate this:
How @equitablegrowth showed inequality helps growth when arguing inequality harms growth
10 Aug 2015 1 Comment
by Jim Rose in applied price theory, applied welfare economics, comparative institutional analysis, currency unions, economic growth, economic history, economics of regulation, entrepreneurship, Euro crisis, fiscal policy, global financial crisis (GFC), income redistribution, labour economics, labour supply, macroeconomics, Marxist economics, poverty and inequality, Public Choice, public economics, rentseeking Tags: British disease, entrepreneurial alertness, Eurosclerosis, France, German unification, Germany, growth of government, sick man of Europe, social insurance, Sweden, taxation and entrepreneurship, taxation and investment, taxation and labour supply, welfare state
The Washington Centre for Equitable Growth recently tweeted that inequality harms growth in the USA as compared to Sweden, France, Germany and the UK. It was relying on some dodgy OECD research.
.@OECD sees continued rise in growth-harming inequality, reports @PaulHannon29 on.wsj.com/1EZpq1S http://t.co/xt4heZysXT—
Equitable Growth (@equitablegrowth) May 21, 2015
The Washington Centre for Equitable Growth did not check their inequality ratios they tweeted against trends in economic growth and economic policy since 1970, which I have reproduced in figure 1. Germany is not included in figure 1 because German data on growth is thrown askew by German unification.
Figure 1: Real GDP per British, French and Swede aged 15-64, 2014 US$ (converted to 2014 price level with updated 2011 PPPs), 1.9 per cent detrended, 1970-2013
Source: Computed from OECD Stat Extract and The Conference Board. 2015. The Conference Board Total Economy Database™, May 2015, http://www.conference-board.org/data/economydatabase/
Figure 1 shows that France has been in a long-term decline since the late 1970s despite the blessings of a more equal society than the USA as championed by the Washington Centre for Equitable Growth. In figure 1, a flat line is growth in real GDP per working age person, PPP, at the same rate as the USA for the 20th century, which was 1.9% per year. A falling line in figure 1 indicates growth of less than 1.9% while a rising line indicates growth in real GDP per working age person, PPP, in excess of 1.9%. In figure 1, France hardly ever grew at the trend rate of growth for the USA of 1.9% per year and was frequently well below that rate.

Sweden tells a slightly different story in figure 1 because of regime change in the early 1990s when Sweden adopted more liberal economic policies where taxes and government spending were reduced:
The rapid growth of the state in the late 1960s and 1970s led to a large decline in Sweden’s relative economic performance. In 1975, Sweden was the 4th richest industrialised country in terms of GDP per head. By 1993, it had fallen to 14th.
@alexvoronov använda smygfinansiering av Generell Välfärd är alltid av ondo. @NimaSanandaji: bit.ly/1Nar2eV http://t.co/wD0YEgncIE—
Old Whig (@aClassicLiberal) August 05, 2015
That regime change reversed a long economic decline since 1970 under the egalitarian policies of the Swedish Social Democratic Party. Under the Swedish Social Democratic Party, Sweden was almost always growing at less than the trend rate of growth of the USA, which was 1.9%. That position reversed only when there was a turn away from big government and high taxes.

Figure 1 tells a similar story for the British economy: a long economic decline in the 1970s when Britain was the sick man of Europe. Under Thatchernomics, Europe had a long economic boom for 20 years or more – see figure 1.
In the 1970s, under the high taxes of the Heath, Callaghan and Wilson administrations, as figure 1 shows, Britain was the sick man of Europe. With the election of the Thatcher Government, Britain soon grew at better than the US trend growth rate for nearly 20 years through few exceptions.
Graph of the Day: The UK has among the lowest total tax rates on businesses in the G7 http://t.co/l6mMhN9yLD—
CPS Think Tank (@CPSThinkTank) August 04, 2015
Rate this:
Which Nation Has the Worst Dependency Ratio?
09 Aug 2015 1 Comment
by Jim Rose in economic history, politics - USA, public economics Tags: ageing society, demographic crisis, dependency ratio, social insurance
Past, present, and future of the welfare state… http://t.co/1gcGree4o1—
Austrian EconoCenter (@AustrianCenter) June 22, 2015
For both policy reasons and narcissism, I wish the most popular item ever posted on International Liberty was Mitchell’s Golden Rule.
But that guide to sensible fiscal policy isn’t even in the top 70.
Instead, my most-read post is a set of cartoons showing how the welfare state inevitably metastasizes as more and more people are lured into the wagon of government dependency.
I suspect these cartoons are popular because they succinctly capture and express a concern that is instinctively felt by many people.
But instinct isn’t the same as evidence.
So I’ve shared various estimates of America’s growing dependency problem, though I’ve also warned that these numbers don’t necessarily tell the full story.
Given my dissatisfaction with the current estimates, I was very interested to see a new attempt to measure the degree to which nations are undermined by ever-expanding redistribution. Writing for the Mises Institute and…
View original post 590 more words
Rate this:
I didn’t know unemployment benefit eligibility was so strict in New Zealand
03 Aug 2015 2 Comments
by Jim Rose in labour economics, labour supply, occupational choice, politics - Australia, politics - New Zealand, politics - USA, poverty and inequality, unemployment, welfare reform Tags: social insurance, taxation and labour supply, unemployment benefits, welfare reform
How strict are eligibility criteria for #unemployment benefits in #OECD and #EU countries? oe.cd/14y http://t.co/MDjzhSz98l—
OECD Publications (@OECD_Pubs) July 30, 2015
More than 42m are unemployed in the #OECD area – around 10m more than before the #crisis oe.cd/14v #jobs http://t.co/ElEZ579bCw—
OECD Publications (@OECD_Pubs) July 29, 2015
The recovery is underway, but time is running out to help workers move up the #jobs ladder oe.cd/12P http://t.co/GCJdfvmDQW—
OECD Publications (@OECD_Pubs) July 10, 2015
Rate this:
Gender differences on science policy
31 Jul 2015 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in economics of regulation, health economics Tags: gender gap, risk risk trade-offs, science policy, social insurance
Men & women disagree on many science issues, most prominently the use of animals in research http://t.co/nmas3TzEeZ pic.twitter.com/fbpDqrhBpq
— Pew Research Center (@pewresearch) July 2, 2015
Rate this:
James Bartholomew introduces his new book, ‘The Welfare of Nations’.
31 Jul 2015 1 Comment
by Jim Rose in labour economics, labour supply, poverty and inequality, unemployment, welfare reform Tags: James Bartholomew, poverty traps, social insurance, Social Security, taxation and the labour supply, welfare reform, welfare state
And here is my own video introduction to the new book. Welfare states have caused more unhappiness than inequality. https://t.co/mUWrGyVWfw
— James Bartholomew (@JGBartholomew) March 28, 2015
And here is my own video introduction to the new book. Welfare states have caused more unhappiness than inequality. https://t.co/mUWrGyVWfw
— James Bartholomew (@JGBartholomew) March 28, 2015
Rate this:
Average effective retirement age by gender in the PIGS, 1970 – 2012
27 Jul 2015 Leave a comment
by Jim Rose in currency unions, economic history, Euro crisis, fiscal policy, labour economics, labour supply Tags: ageing society, demographics crisis, economics of retirement, female labour force participation, Greece, Italy, male labour force participation, old age pensions, older workers, Portugal, social insurance, Social Security, Spain, taxation and labour supply
Figure 1 shows a relatively distinct pattern for men in the PIGs. Portugal aside, there has been a long decline retirement ages. This is different to the Anglo-Saxon countries where effective retirement ages have been increasing in recent years for men.
Figure 1: average effective retirement age (5-year averages), men, Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain, 1970 – 2012
Source: OECD Pensions at a Glance.
Figure 2 shows that apart from Greece, that after a long decline in female effective retirement ages, there was something the rebound, especially in Italy and Portugal. In Greece, the rebound was in the 80s, followed by a resumption of decline from the mid 90s.
Figure 2: average effective retirement age (5-year averages), women, Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain, 1970 – 2012
Source: OECD Pensions at a Glance.
Rate this:

Recent Comments